MartyFunkhouser
Garth Crooks
Seeing as I don't rate him, for balance, he was very good yesterday
his delivery in the box was 1 in 5 at best. lots of floaters that found no one instead of accurate flat pinged crossesSeeing as I don't rate him, for balance, he was very good yesterday
Had a very good game, showed again under RDZ the player he is.
Had a very good game, showed again under RDZ the player he is.
He's OK but I think we could upgrade him, his crossing and general attacking play has got worse and he's never been that good at actual defending. One of the people I think we need to be ruthless with and sell - I think Spence is good enough to start and we'll obviously need another back up. Ideally someone who is a bit more experienced. I wonder if Walker might fancy coming back.
i don't think he had a good game. especially under rdz - his crosses are floaters that are easily read by defenders and he isn't as attack minded like djed is going forward, especially in 1 v 1s.Had a very good game, showed again under RDZ the player he is.
Spence is not a better player than Porro, not even close
Not having a go at you, but really don't understand not rating the guy, he's not a defensive FB but he's levels above any of our other FBs and if we wanted to sell him, he'd be one of the few players that would go to a better club.
Is he more like Trent who's good going forwards but can't defend? That's how I see him and I think first and foremost fbs do need to defend and lets not forget he's been first choice RB in a team that finished 17th 2 seasons in a row. We cant keep saying these players are good enough because they're not and if we can get a decent fee then we should take it.
Spence is a different kind of full back but I'd be comfortable with him being first choice, he's good enough and we don't have Europe either. I'd take someone like Walker as a back up - would be a great player for Spence to learn from.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.