• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Pedro Porro

Gutter Boy said:
Nothing wrong with signing a player who had the one good game of his career against us. Where has that ever gone wrong for us before?
Click to expand...

Ahh, so you're an expert on the ins and outs of Portuguese football?

A work colleague is a huge Sporting fan and he is not happy to see Porro leave.
 
greatwhitenorf said:
Looks good. We're spending smartly to bring in someone Conte wants and will fix a sagging element of his week-in, week-out tactics.

And he'll bring up our quotient of snappy haircuts and sharp-looking tattoos.

Porro and Danjuma. Not a bad January transfer window. Again. Doesn't solve all the problems but gives us some solid squad options and puts the wind up the pantlegs of Doherty and Emerson - to say nowt of Son and Richarlison - and clearly shows that the manager's patience isn't to be tested for too long.

For all the backline issues recently griped and moaned about here and elsewhere, adding a couple of strong attacking options might well be the easiest way to solve defensive issues.
Click to expand...

By some miracle we might get hincappie.
 
greatwhitenorf said:
Looks good. We're spending smartly to bring in someone Conte wants and will fix a sagging element of his week-in, week-out tactics.

And he'll bring up our quotient of snappy haircuts and sharp-looking tattoos.

Porro and Danjuma. Not a bad January transfer window. Again. Doesn't solve all the problems but gives us some solid squad options and puts the wind up the pantlegs of Doherty and Emerson - to say nowt of Son and Richarlison - and clearly shows that the manager's patience isn't to be tested for too long.

For all the backline issues recently griped and moaned about here and elsewhere, adding a couple of strong attacking options might well be the easiest way to solve defensive issues.
Click to expand...

Yes, so assuming that Porro signs, that's window (very) good or better windows in a row from Paratici
 
harr1984 said:
I must say Twitter has completely baffled me. I’ve had an account for some years but never used it, and for a change this transfer window I started to go on there.

The amount of Spurs fans with the brains the size of a peanut (and I’m well aware this isn’t exclusive to Spurs) is incredible. No one on there was talking about Pedro Porro a few months ago - now apparently Spurs are going to collapse if they don’t sign him. It’s all Levy’s fault without having a genuine clue what is going on, and there are experts on there explaining why a £2.6m administration charge is ‘normal’ and Levy should just pay it and not bat an eye lid.

I feel like the place is exclusive to twelve year olds and below, it really is cringeworthy. I know you can find the odd bit of funny on there, but how some of you lot can look on there day in day out I will never know:D….
Click to expand...
Yeh I voyeur on there to see what's what and it's really a joke. Some high profile kn0bheads on there, loads of posters like Brian Dagul and his mates like Bob Spur, Stelios and Savva who just lost the plot about every signing but like I've said on here none of them come back and admit when they are wrong. They all follow the same rhetoric, it's "sign this guy if we don't Levy is a cnut" and when they do sign....silence...when they fail...silence (Ndombele was a classic as it took all summer).

The issue now isn't so much they talk crap, because they do, but they have now created personalities that they pedal for clout rather than being objective and honest about the landscape.

They are also, in whole a bunch of cut and paste merchants who cuckold over Chelsea, its all abit pathetic

Sent from my SM-A127F using Fapatalk
 
AdamB said:
So Edwards is worth around £18m, on the basis that they wanted £2.6m more and we knocked our % down by 15%
Click to expand...
Or more but suppose its better to lose theoretical cash than hand over another cold 2.6m off the bat as Sporting will have to sell and go through all that jazz which looks unlikely until the summer now.

Sent from my SM-A127F using Fapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back