thfcsteff
Garth Crooks
I find thisinteresting.
You are a great advocate of AVB, usually citing there have been major changes to our team and that he can't be judged until he has the players he wants and it will take time to implement a style. Basically you give him a free pass at the moment because he nees time. As it happens I agree with you 100%.
However when it comes to Redknapp and QPR, Redknapp is expected to turn it around immediately and if he doesn't, he fails?
Nope.
As usual, you get it wrong. But that's de rigor. You've doubtless done it before in another life, and I'm sure you'll do it again (that is IF we believe in reincarnation...)
Redknapp is smart and has absolutely covered both ends here. He has set the situation up to get paid handsomely regardless of the outcome. It is my personal belief that he would not have taken the job on unless he felt there was a good chance of keeping them up. But he has already set his public stall, saying it would be next to impossible to keep them up.
The other thing with regards to this quote of mine, is that you have selected it without any regard (or comment) on the many other comments I have made in this thread. Typical really. And you rebuke others for similar behavior.
I will be honest. I find the whole QPR situation fascinating. I called it early on (like a few others) and it has come to pass. If he keeps them up, I am intrigued to see how he does it and what the spin will be (or, indeed, what tools he has to raid from other familiar toolboxes to get it done). If they go down, oh well, it was expected right? Basically, harry has been brought in on a wing and a prayer; AVB has been brought in and is expected to maintain standards and improve on them despite key players not being at the club anymore. They are very different tasks, each requiring their own specific skills. I hope both men achieve what they have set out to do. My question really is what Harry has set out to achieve with QPR?