Bit harsh. He did ok filling the position after Walker left, and there was quite a common understanding as time went by that his position wasn't a priority to upgrade. He wasn't great defensively then and he isn't now. He has been in a slump after WC, but I think much can be due to over-confidence (as opposed to Sissoko's obvious under-confidence), and tbf he wasn't alone in thinking he was the dog's semen holding appendage after returning from Russia. And now he has problems getting his head up. But yeah, it is now one of the positions we need to strengthen if we are to take the final step.
Well, when Walker left, I wanted Aurier to immediately become first choice - once he had become first choice, I never really minded his occasional penalty giveaway or misthrow, because he was new to the team - he'd learn, and get less nervous.
But to me, Aurier has what it takes to be a wing-back for us - searing pace, and a great deal of physicality and grit. Walker had that in abundance. Trippier just doesn't. And last summer, I wanted Trippier moved on while he was coming off a WC high and we could ask for big money for him - because I felt he wasn't worth what was being quoted for him at the time, and I felt Walker-Peters could do a good job shadowing Aurier.
Fundamentally, Trippier is not a starting right-back for a team like Spurs. When he was a backup for Walker, playing at the Lane (where the pitch was narrow, and the ground he needed to cover shorter), he did okay. But we need top athletes to play in those full-back slots in wide spaces, like at Wembley and now the new Lane. Trippier is slow, he's weak, he's not great in the air, and now he's been thinking he's the dog's b*llocks, with attendant negative effects on his concentration. He isn't that type of player, and it isn't fair on us, or on him, to keep playing there and expecting him to be something he isn't.