It is pretty much exactly what I expected.
This post will be general mate, just using your words as a launching pad!
Still wrong though. 4 would've been 'just about' understandable. I think the most amusing thing is how people (including some here) have run riot with the words 'eye-gouge'...he didn't! He grabbed his face. Not clever and not excusable by any stretch (a flat-hand to the nose or even a shove to the forehead would've clearly been better - or the hold grail - take him out in play a minute or two later) but there were no fingers in the eye (or eyes). The way this one got spun, you'd have thought he blinded him through the socket!
Let's be honest here. Moose is paying the price for
1) a lack of discipline - no problem, 3 game ban on the chin IMO and don't do it again
2) Clattenberg's pathetic 'performance'
3) 3 weeks of pre-match public comments by Chelsea players and management
4) an immediate intimidation and bullying which escalated as the game went on
We lost it, yes. At 2-0 we should've been hitting the deck at every single thing they did to us, not retaliating clearly and obviously. That is how you win dark arts football. But again, we will learn, and sadly, I think some of our supporters ned to get to grips with this reality, that in order to win you have to engage, or else go decades without a trophy. It doesn't mean sacrificing your football, it means supplementing it when necessary and in the face of tossers. Like Fergie's Utd.
I was surprised that they let Lamela away with it, and can only assume that they knew if they penalized him, they'd have had to ban Fabregas for several things, not the least of which was inciting a brawl at the final whistle and (of course) starting all this with his 'informed' comments on Sky.