• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Morgan Gibbs-White

Just on the whole "Forest trying to get larger bids in" idea, it doesn't work. A release clause is a release clause as in, you agree to deposit £60m and he is released from his contract. In that context, it doesnt matter if another club offers £100m, he is still entitled to choose us over them if we have met the release clause. Once the release clause is triggered, Forest effectively lose control of the situstion. Which is probably why they are f*cked off

This is my understanding too.

My only knowledge of Forrests owner is seeing him be arrogant and entitled towards Nuno when they lost to fall out of the top 4 .

I think maybe he is just a nob whos throwing his toys out the pram. Levy was careufl to make sure Kane had a genelemans agreement rather than a full on release clause. Forrest owner is bitter he made an agreement he now regrets.

Tapping up always happens in fooball and its very difficult to prove. Agents are everyhwere and they always work in the backgrounds. It is something which is technically illegal but always impossible to proove.

Had this been a non release clause issue ther may be something in it but with a release clause its clear to anyone Forest have no grounds for complaint.
 
Back