• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Mauricio Pochettino - Sacked

All he's really saying is what everybody has known all along (despite explicit and repeated denials in the past), which is that the new stadium is having and will continue to have a significant impact on transfer spending. Well, blow me down.
Which is an impact that would happen to any club - We are fortunate enough to have a combination of an intelligent chairman and coach to see us through such a potentially difficult period and still enable us to compete. Levy's business/financial nous combined with Poch's ability to develop young talented players is a perfect combination for our current plight.....
 
Which is an impact that would happen to any club - We are fortunate enough to have a combination of an intelligent chairman and coach to see us through such a potentially difficult period and still enable us to compete. Levy's business/financial nous combined with Poch's ability to develop young talented players is a perfect combination for our current plight.....

Pretty much my thoughts as well.
 
Don't agree, I think what was said is likely (my interpretation)

- The stadium does impact our view of spending (should not be a surprise there)
- Hence we are less likely to take risks

What I expect that will mean is buys like Alli, Dier, Eriksen (5-15M range) that we feel would be a good fit, young and with resale value will continue. However, buys like Soldado (expensive and unproven in league) or a random "buy someone as cover because we didn't get our man" won't.

And as much as I love Poch, I think he's deflecting a little here, I don't think he likes big squads, and I think he's ultra picky around who he wants to buy. My bet, we didn't but this window not because the club couldn't find 15M, but because Poch's very small list of targets weren't available.
Exactly
 
I don't think Poch likes the idea of big money signings anyway.

He's authoritarian and plays a high tempo game. Anyone with a hint of an ego wouldn't last very long in the setup.

Son is the only big money signing he's made to date. And he's obviously a particular 'good egg' - someone who will submit to the coach's vision and put the graft in.

All he's really saying is what everybody has known all along (despite explicit and repeated denials in the past), which is that the new stadium is having and will continue to have a significant impact on transfer spending. Well, blow me down.

The evidence is quite striking if people bothered to look at it:

- 2001-2007 - annual net transfer spend = £20m
- October 2007 - new stadium announced
- 2008-2016 - annual net transfer spend = £0m

That's about £160m which has been redirected to TH Property Ltd.
 
Where in the financial reports does it show that money leaving to TH Property Ltd.?

I'd like to think it is being squirreled away but I'd imagine the more likely explanation is its being spent elsewhere in the running of the club
 
Where in the financial reports does it show that money leaving to TH Property Ltd.?

I'd like to think it is being squirreled away but I'd imagine the more likely explanation is its being spent elsewhere in the running of the club

TH Property is an offshore ENIC company that they've used for purchasing all the land and paying for all the groundwork.

It's just moving money between ENIC companies, but TH Property is Bahamas based, so presumably all the capital spending coming from there is because of tax advantages.
 
I don't think Poch likes the idea of big money signings anyway.

He's authoritarian and plays a high tempo game. Anyone with a hint of an ego wouldn't last very long in the setup.

Son is the only big money signing he's made to date. And he's obviously a particular 'good egg' - someone who will submit to the coach's vision and put the graft in.



The evidence is quite striking if people bothered to look at it:

- 2001-2007 - annual net transfer spend = £20m
- October 2007 - new stadium announced
- 2008-2016 - annual net transfer spend = £0m

That's about £160m which has been redirected to TH Property Ltd.

£160m?
What you basing that on? 8 x £20m?
Do you really think we have the exact same ingoings and outgoings every year apart from transfer fees?
Look at wages £44m in 2007, up to £100m in 2014. Isn't that where our old transfer money went under Redknapp.

Isn't TH Property Ltd just a tax avoidance company the club owns property around WHL through?

And didn't the last annual report June 2014 say the club had spent £40.9m to that date on the NDP?
 
TH Property is an offshore ENIC company that they've used for purchasing all the land and paying for all the groundwork.

It's just moving money between ENIC companies, but TH Property is Bahamas based, so presumably all the capital spending coming from there is because of tax advantages.

Right so where is the proof in the financial reports that we're paying the money you think we're saving, by having a net transfer spend, in to this off shore company?
 
Right so where is the proof in the financial reports that we're paying the money you think we're saving, by having a net transfer spend, in to this off shore company?

Hertyid said this: I know for a fact that we don't have free cash flow right now, it's all being reinvested into the NDP.

The Goat said that's wrong.

I do think we are investing as much as we can, when we can though. Putting it away in an offshore account? Nah.
 
Hertyid said this: I know for a fact that we don't have free cash flow right now, it's all being reinvested into the NDP.

The Goat said that's wrong.

I do think we are investing as much as we can, when we can though. Putting it away in an offshore account? Nah.

I think it's just another example of Gutterboy confusing what he'd like to be true with reality
 
I don't think Poch likes the idea of big money signings anyway.

He's authoritarian and plays a high tempo game. Anyone with a hint of an ego wouldn't last very long in the setup.

Son is the only big money signing he's made to date. And he's obviously a particular 'good egg' - someone who will submit to the coach's vision and put the graft in.



The evidence is quite striking if people bothered to look at it:

- 2001-2007 - annual net transfer spend = £20m
- October 2007 - new stadium announced
- 2008-2016 - annual net transfer spend = £0m

That's about £160m which has been redirected to TH Property Ltd.

You're not taking into account the 2003 £15 million Rights Issue which was specifically designated to be for Glenn Hoddle's transfer kitty. Take that away and ENIC have done little more than just about break even since they arrived in 2001. Some may be disappointed in that. Others may think it's a sign of a well-run club considering the improvement on and off the field during that time.

http://www.footballeconomy.com/archive/archive_2003_jul_05.htm
 
“I have read some players, like Toby [Alderweireld], have said that at Tottenham now there are ‘no heroes’, that we are all together and our key is to be all together and to feel that,” Pochettino said. “This is an important thing and a message for all of our supporters. I think the energy that we create and the synergy between our supporters and the team, I think that is very important for our future.”
 
Tottenham head coach Mauricio Pochettino on his decision not to sign any senior players in January: "You can spend a lot of money and create a big team and win everything.

"But sometimes you can maybe not spend too much money and buy cleverly and by mixing the pieces you can build a big team too.

"If you get success, you are shown to be right. If not, the people kill you."
Steady on Poch. We're not that bad.

But if you loose you're dead.
 
Last edited:
You kno
Steady on Poch. We're not that bad.

But if you loose your dead.

I do like how he equated us with 'the people', like we're some great, slumbering mass that can rise to revolution and change the course of history. Makes it feel like complaining on a message board is literally this:

Jacques_Bertaux_-_Prise_du_palais_des_Tuileries_-_1793.jpg



..whereas just saying 'the fans kill you' makes it far less invigorating. :p
 
They would have to disclose any payments to TH Property limited and they have.

In 2014, the group invoiced TH property limited for £274,181 (nil in the prior year) for expenses incurred on its behalf. As at 30 June 2014, TH property owed £14,738 was still owed to the group. TH proerty also invoiced the group for £451,253 (nil in the prior year) which has completely been paid by 30 June 2014.

In 2013, TH property limited bought the properties around the stadium for a market price of £27.6m resulting in a profit of £5.6m which was paid and that cash was used to pay off the Bank of Scotland loan .

So:

1. Property was directed to TH property for the sum of £27.6m which was £5.6m more than we paid (there will be a bit of depreciation there on the buildings as land is not depreciated);
2. The cash flow was actually incoming to the club not outgoing so not sure where you get the £160m from @gutterboy;
3. I think this shows that TH property purchased the land from the club. They could have purchased more land around the stadium, but it wouldn't have been from the club (as this would show in the accounts) and nor is it sinister in the slightest. I would imagine that the reason for this is so that when they sell that land, they can avoid paying capital gains tax; and
4. I believe (but don't know for sure) that the property transferred was the buying of the shops and flats around the ground and near vicinity. Point being to probably reduce the possibility of complaints about the development and compulsory purchases but also to monetise some of the ancillary benefits of the stadium development i.e. the rise in property prices.
 
You might well be right.

Look, steff: I'm sorry, mate. I've kinda realised that my frustration and disappointment spills over into the forum too easily at times, and that's despite my newfound attempts to stay calm and put it in perspective. I've never held anything against those I could hold a reasoned conversation with, and I never will: trust me when I say that I understand why you and the others I enjoy interacting with (most of this forum) can get annoyed with my posting behaviour at times.

I won't be able to change my pessimistic outlook as easily as you suggest: it's odd, because I've mostly been a happy-go-lucky type in areas not involving Spurs, often to my great detriment. :p I suppose the ghost of 2011/2012 still hangs heavy on me and makes me see pitfalls where others only see gold-paved roads. But what I can change is my contributions to this forum, and I'll keep trying to do so, hopefully with more success going forward.

Stay frosty, mate. ;)

You've got nothing to apologise for. Whereas I may not agree with your outlook in this instance, you're perfectly entitled to your opinion. I'd rather you could share my outlook but I'm not going to force you. You support the club that I support. That makes you better than most in my book. Just lay off the hyperbole. Fairy world? Ha!
 
You kno


I do like how he equated us with 'the people', like we're some great, slumbering mass that can rise to revolution and change the course of history. Makes it feel like complaining on a message board is literally this:

Jacques_Bertaux_-_Prise_du_palais_des_Tuileries_-_1793.jpg



..whereas just saying 'the fans kill you' makes it far less invigorating. :p
When YOU complain on a message board it's like that. When I do it is more like Les Misérables (with background music and all) ;)
 
that poch interview could have been given by levy himself.
its a good sign at the moment, i guess , of alignment at the management level.

once the stadium is built and our cash flow increases, there will be more funds available which would increase player transfer options. levy is likely to up the ante, and hopefully will be able to keep the management alignment as we grow.
 
Back