When things are clearly not right like in Saints away a couple of months ago it’s ridiculous not to change things earlier, were things somehow miraculously going to change in that game by the same players doing the same thing? Not asking for subs just for the sake of it!
But how is it possible to even argue with the logic “he’s the manager, he must be doing it for a reason that you can never understand”?! That’s my biggest eye roll mate!
I just think it’s this thing that’s gathering steam, and there’s no real nuanced discussion of it. I don’t think it’s ridiculous to suggest a clearly talented Premier League manager under pressure to win an important game wouldn’t consider that he may be more likely to win those points if he made a change, if he thought it possible. The fact that he so clearly doesn’t a lot of the time suggests to me there is something bigger going on.
For instance, we all know that players need to be really in form to play well in a Poch system. The struggles of Wanyama and Rose this year for instance suggest if they aren’t in the groove, they probably won’t be adding that much value.
We change formations and systems in match quite a lot. Maybe Poch prefers that method which can have an element of preparation and rhythm to it rather than potential disruption from subs.
Besides, we often come back to win or draw when we were behind. And we are often always ahead. To pick the games in isolation where we didn’t end up winning doesn’t prove anything.
Maybe it’s part of a strategy based on the fitness work. The idea that if we are fitter, and the players have gotten in to a groove and can have rehearsed certain system changes, then maybe we will be more likely to win than making changes.
I don’t know the answer for sure, because I’m not on his back room staff, but I’m pretty sure there’s a strategy behind it and not some blatant blind spot that only has benefits and no drawbacks, and Poch just hasn’t figured it out yet.