• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Mathys Tel

Kompakted said:
Looking at that German data looks like he's a predominantly left winger. Can someone tell me if he is primarily left or right footed? Or relatively two-footed and what his instinct is when playing there. I think ideally Angeball requires both wide players to attack on the OUTSIDE when they're on the ball and try and hit the ball low across goal or take a shot on themselves while attacking on the INSIDE when they're off the ball when the ball is on the opposite flank (i.e. they should be in the box waiting for the cut-back/cross).
Click to expand...

He's play left/middle/right, and is two footed.

Preference seems to be left, and his natural foot is right.
 
Bishop said:
Been doing my research via YouTube more so analysis videos rather than highlights and he seems to be right footed but with a very good left foot. When he's dribbling he will pass or cross with either foot depending on the situation. He has played mainly off the left but can play on the right. On the left he mainly cuts in but can go on the outside and hit accurate crosses with his left. On the right he still goes inside but is more likely to cross the ball it seems.

I'm just intrigued as to where we intend on playing him. Is it striker, the left or the right? The right is our position of most need long term but you could argue that striker is needed right now.
Click to expand...
He plays with Odobert in the French younger age groups so it'll be interesting to see where they've both played when starting together.
 
Bishop said:
Been doing my research via YouTube more so analysis videos rather than highlights and he seems to be right footed but with a very good left foot. When he's dribbling he will pass or cross with either foot depending on the situation. He has played mainly off the left but can play on the right. On the left he mainly cuts in but can go on the outside and hit accurate crosses with his left. On the right he still goes inside but is more likely to cross the ball it seems.

I'm just intrigued as to where we intend on playing him. Is it striker, the left or the right? The right is our position of most need long term but you could argue that striker is needed right now.
Click to expand...
You say that but I think Ange loves Brennan Johnson. He's everything he looks for in that position. What I'm interested in is having someone that can take on their man and stretch teams. That opens the door for a player like Johnson who isn't someone that thrives when in a corner but as someone that gets into the positions Ange wants and is a clinical finisher - the issue for me with Johnson's effectiveness in this system is with what has been going on, on the left flank. Sonny isn't ideal in the Ange system, Richarlison, Odobert and Moore haven't been fit. If Tel can be someone that can stretch the left flank with pave and fire the ball across or score himself i think Johnson could push into the high teens or 20s for goals, his output is that good.
 
DubSpur said:
He can't if we decide to take up the option of making the deal permanent. Well he can't for 6 years unless we agree to it.
Click to expand...

I've read itherwise, that Tel has a say. Meaning that the option cantbbe executed unilaterally.

Oh well, too late for that anyway. Competition is good, and he's a good plan B up front, totally different from Richy
 
Surfless said:
I think the loan fee is probably coming out of what is owed. Not the final optional payment.
Click to expand...

I think the bit I wasn't understanding well enough was about the revenue only being attained when the money is collected from BM. So if BM paid us £40m on the transfer date of Kane, and then £20m a year for 3 years after then that is what goes into THFC's P&L. It's all about keeping things in balance. So if say we are completing our last payments to Juve on Kulu and Bents this year then that cashflow frees up for the next round of purchases.

Not sure what our current unpaid debt is on prior player purchases but I'm guessing as high as it's ever been based on some of the transfer fees we've seen recently.
 
metalgear said:
I've read itherwise, that Tel has a say. Meaning that the option cantbbe executed unilaterally.

Oh well, too late for that anyway. Competition is good, and he's a good plan B up front, totally different from Richy
Click to expand...
If Tel really didn't wanna sign for us, he could down tools and poo on the floor of Levy's office and say he'll never sprint again for us, at which point he would be shown the door.
We only want players that want to be here. So whether Tel has a say or not, is a moot point. He will always have the right to defecate and demonstrate.
 
After reading numerous conversations about us being an unattractive option but then reading thru the runners and riders whom were after Tel...he chose us. Go figure

It's either ''the president' or 'the manager' doing good work. (as Tel noted)....but let's just imagine it's both, and the set-up is working as planned.

The same set-up that got Radu to choose us over Bayern
And Bergvall to choose us over Barca.

Little old unattractive us.
 
Last edited:
Bullet said:
If Tel really didn't wanna sign for us, he could down tools and poo on the floor of Levy's office and say he'll never sprint again for us, at which point he would be shown the door.
We only want players that want to be here. So whether Tel has a say or not, is a moot point. He will always have the right to defecate and demonstrate.
Click to expand...

Logically, if Mathys wanted join to he would taken the original full transfer, no risk to him if he doesn't perform.

Also this is a translation of German Sky report

Screenshot_20250205_094619_Reddit.jpg

sport.sky.de

Diese Leih-Gebühr kassiert der FC Bayern von Tottenham für Mathys Tel

Nach Sky Infos erhalten die Bayern für die Leihe von Mathys Tel (bis Saisonende) eine Leihgebühr von zehn Millionen Euro.
sport.sky.de sport.sky.de
 
ricky2tricky4city said:
After reading numerous conversations about us being an unattractive option but then reading thru the runners and riders after Tel...he chose us. Go figure

It's either ''the president' or 'the manager' doing good work. (as Tel noted)....but let's just imagine it's both, and the set-up is working as planned.

The same set-up that got Radu to choose us over Bayern
And Bergvall to choose us over Barca.

Little old unattractive us.
Click to expand...
Laughing stock. Lange has no clue. Levy just doing things for optics/PR. No one good would want to come anyway. No real plan, just panicking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back