• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Jan Paul van Hecke

No idea
I just do t think we could play him and senesi together for example because neither is aerially good
And we have players like Micky who defensively leaps like a brick
But they can all pass so well

Its going to be interesting to see what happens, I suppose we are working at keeping the ball for longer periods rather than exposing ourselves to defending for long periods.
 
No idea
I just do t think we could play him and senesi together for example because neither is aerially good
And we have players like Micky who defensively leaps like a brick
But they can all pass so well

In the heydays of Poch who of those 3 would he likely have wanted to use the most in your opinion?
I ask about Poch because he liked CB solidity but also valued the ability for his CBs to play well with the ball on the deck
 
No idea
I just do t think we could play him and senesi together for example because neither is aerially good
And we have players like Micky who defensively leaps like a brick
But they can all pass so well
Micky can't pass, he can progress with the ball at his feet but passing, nah he's very basic in that regard.
 
It's amazing how put out some of you get when a players potential negatives get discussed

But in most cases they are not potential, they are cold clear facts gathered by watching the player (on tv/highlights), unquestionable stats (usually with little context) or expert analysis on social media (which is never wrong).
 
But in most cases they are not potential, they are cold clear facts gathered by watching the player (on tv/highlights), unquestionable stats (usually with little context) or expert analysis on social media (which is never wrong).

Um no that's just you not liking any non-positive comments
 
Back