• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Jan Paul van Hecke

Bedfordspurs said:
No idea
I just do t think we could play him and senesi together for example because neither is aerially good
And we have players like Micky who defensively leaps like a brick
But they can all pass so well
Click to expand...

Its going to be interesting to see what happens, I suppose we are working at keeping the ball for longer periods rather than exposing ourselves to defending for long periods.
 
Bedfordspurs said:
No idea
I just do t think we could play him and senesi together for example because neither is aerially good
And we have players like Micky who defensively leaps like a brick
But they can all pass so well
Click to expand...

In the heydays of Poch who of those 3 would he likely have wanted to use the most in your opinion?
I ask about Poch because he liked CB solidity but also valued the ability for his CBs to play well with the ball on the deck
 
Bedfordspurs said:
No idea
I just do t think we could play him and senesi together for example because neither is aerially good
And we have players like Micky who defensively leaps like a brick
But they can all pass so well
Click to expand...
Micky can't pass, he can progress with the ball at his feet but passing, nah he's very basic in that regard.
 
billyiddo said:
It's amazing how put out some of you get when a players potential negatives get discussed
Click to expand...

But in most cases they are not potential, they are cold clear facts gathered by watching the player (on tv/highlights), unquestionable stats (usually with little context) or expert analysis on social media (which is never wrong).
 
K.D.D.D.D.Soc said:
But in most cases they are not potential, they are cold clear facts gathered by watching the player (on tv/highlights), unquestionable stats (usually with little context) or expert analysis on social media (which is never wrong).
Click to expand...

Um no that's just you not liking any non-positive comments
 
K.D.D.D.D.Soc said:
Possibly but my underlying points are valid, many post quote stats and have only seen glimpses of the players on screen. My comments on social media hold a lot of credence as they are frequently referred to.
Click to expand...

No one knows how he will perform until we see him in our shirt- until then we're feeding on scraps of information to piece together an idea, both positive & negative
 
K.D.D.D.D.Soc said:
Possibly but my underlying points are valid, many post quote stats and have only seen glimpses of the players on screen. My comments on social media hold a lot of credence as they are frequently referred to.
Click to expand...

I actually ignore most of them stats because I saw him and he was caught out under crosses twice, one which ended up being a goal, so the "Duels won 3/4" is miss leading.

Before anyone gets upset, thats not me saying he is a bad buy, I am just saying what I saw
 
In the Spence thread, people are mostly discussing Gray. In this one, we seem to be discussing VdV. This old man is getting very confused 🙂
 
MartyFunkhouser said:
I actually ignore most of them stats because I saw him and he was caught out under crosses twice, one which ended up being a goal, so the "Duels won 3/4" is miss leading.

Before anyone gets upset, thats not me saying he is a bad buy, I am just saying what I saw
Click to expand...

I don't think he had a great game defensively, but don't think VVD did either, Netherlands defensively looks suspect.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back