Practices, the same shamanistic religions and cultures that have been possibly 1000s of years ahead of the west in terms of recycling and reuse, ecological balance etc....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy
Practices, the same shamanistic religions and cultures that have been possibly 1000s of years ahead of the west in terms of recycling and reuse, ecological balance etc....
What's the part of the world braineclipse is from got to do with it?
A stupid belief is a stupid belief no matter where in the world or what culture that person is from. And there is no equating the two - a blowie from a ginger is a real thing, no matter how disgusting and evil it is (sorry gingers), juju is just made up nonsense.
My days
who are you?
100% agree
That's like the third time we have been on EXACTLY the same wavelength!!...
Brain is a logical modern type intellectual guy. He'll laugh off most things that arent tangible or have an element of science to it. I wouldnt take it too personally or seriously. iTs not as if his views are the only ones around
Oreintlism and the exotification of the other are academic western discourses. The belittling other cultures as a way to justify a sense of superiority and thus in the past colonialism and now neo colonialism. Are so ingrained in our culture they have become part of our collective consciousness (in a way). So we hear the word juju, something that I would guess 99% of this board know next to nothing about and emmediately its a source of ridicule and humour.
PS there are some sexy ginger woman out there.... And so few of them its kind of exotic
Seriously? You're the last person I thought would agree with this.
BE and I are laughing off Ade's beliefs as ridiculous (my word, not his). Just as I would any ridiculous belief from any culture.
DTA is, as far as I can tell, saying something along the lines of "How could we intelligent westerners expect Ade to know any better? He only one of those dumb African types"
That's really not what I'm saying and you know it, I'm saying why ridicule what anyone believes.... And I'm saying to do so is an inherently academic western discourse.
Maybe I'm being a bit dim, but was does the shamanistic religions/cultures being 'light years' ahead of the west in terms of recycling and reuse and balanced ecology have to do with the naturalistic fallacy?
From your article:
"In defense of ethical non-naturalism, Moore's argument is concerned with the semantic and metaphysical underpinnings of ethics. In general, opponents of ethical naturalism reject ethical conclusions drawn from natural facts."
Semantics?
It's an inherently acedemic discourse, I'm not sure I'd describe it as Western. There's a very good reason for ridiculing all silly beliefs - it makes the next generation so much less likely to believe in it. By doing so you've helped marginalise what was common belief and helped improve the lives of a generation.
I think you are smart enough to know you are being obtuse there, either that or naive (why I find hard to believe you are). Perhaps look in to so called 'scientific racism' (that was an actual thing guys) and see how it was used to justify colonalism
Seriously? You're the last person I thought would agree with this.
BE and I are laughing off Ade's beliefs as ridiculous (my word, not his). Just as I would any ridiculous belief from any culture.
DTA is, as far as I can tell, saying something along the lines of "How could we intelligent westerners expect Ade to know any better? He only one of those dumb African types"
It's a false (mainly modern and, you'll like this, Western!) belief that something is inherently good or better because it's natural.
Are you are arguing against, recycling re use and a balanced ecology then?
No just agreeing that there are cultures and beliefs outside the ones from western civilizations that have been around much longer than current western culture have been and that , well you know , probably deserve a little bit of respect
Make no mistakes that there are cultures i dont get at all, but if its someone else's culture and belief who am i mark them down for it ?
"He only one of those dumb African types"
i missed that inference...i probably need to go a few more pages back
My days
who are you?
100% agree
That's like the third time we have been on EXACTLY the same wavelength!!...
Brain is a logical modern type intellectual guy. He'll laugh off most things that arent tangible or have an element of science to it. I wouldnt take it too personally or seriously. iTs not as if his views are the only ones around
Practices, the same shamanistic religions and cultures that have been possibly 1000s of years ahead of the west in terms of recycling and reuse, ecological balance etc....
That's really not what I'm saying and you know it, I'm saying why ridicule what anyone believes.... And I'm saying to do so is an inherently academic western discourse.
You're missing the point entirely.
Some people may have used the ridicule of some beliefs in the process of colonialism. Some of them probably did it wearing really nice coats.
I wore a really nice coat to work today, does that mean I came to work to colonise parts of Africa?
So I give you 'scientific racism' and you give me shiny coats.... Interesting.
Yeah, I prefer things with a basis in reality.
I'm sorry, but what does this have to do with spellcasting/juju/whatevers?
When did I ridicule "religions and cultures" as a whole? I was talking about one specific belief! As a basis for humor no less. I think there are positive and negative aspects to many cultures, the same for religions (although perhaps more negative comparatively). Pointing out one negative aspect of one culture is not the same as ridiculing all of that culture, related cultures and all of their views. Your argument is a complete straw man.
Why?
For humor? For entertainment? For education? For progress?
Go ahead, say cultural relativism...
You're just wrong on this being an inherently academic western discourse.
:ross:
The bad guys always get the best outfits. Didn't Hugo Boss cut for the nazis? [/godwin]