thfcsteff
Garth Crooks
This is interesting.
I think it basically shows that the player that is playing AMC is not doing a good enough job breaking into the box. Chadli is doing a good job but he's usually doing it playing in the wide position but the central player (usually Eriksen this season) has to do more to get into the box. When Ade comes deep..Eriksen's instinct has to be to attack the box immediately but we're not seeing that a lot yet
This article also shows that Kane should be very good in that role if given a proper chance.
Absolutely bang-on IMO (KD - this could be a first for us ).
Part of my low-level rumbles about Ericksen have come from the fact I do not believe he is doing enough in the current set-up, although obviously he is our most creative player, so he is a solid conundrum. But there is loads of space outside the box for the attacking three behind the drifting one to move into, and the truth is they aren't taking advantage enough. Lamela needs to shoot more/be more direct too, but I suspect this will come with confidence.
All of this is one of the main reasons I am sad that Lennon has not seized the moment, as pre-season he was getting into those central spots at great speed (albeit again without much end product - which might be what's cooking his current goose with Poch so-to-speak).
I also think that on the basis of the fact he is unafraid to have a dig, Kane would be great in Ade's spot, and given his relationship with Soldado, those two might work very well together if Soldado is one of the three 'behind' off whom Kane drops to create space/thread passes.
But I think the criticism of Ade is actually bordering on hysterical in certain cases, and has far far more to do with who he is perceived to be/how much money he earns than what he's ding on the pitch. Could he have been better? Absolutely. Has he been 'shift'? Absolutely not. And might I add, Finney is correct too IMO, how anyone can watch last weekend's goal and call his contribution minimal, or his pass to Chadli poor, beggars belief.