I
indianspur
Guest
AC Milan's triumphs with the Berlosconi money funding their big names? Inter's trophies with Moratti money?
AC Milan's triumphs with the Berlosconi money funding their big names? Inter's trophies with Moratti money?
Back when I was studying at uni we once had exchange students coming along for a trip around the local area which is made up of a lot of former military bases and coastal artillery positions. There is also a place where a monument is set up for some prisoners of war who were executed a couple of days before the German surrender (my country was one of the many occupied). When we got to this place and the story was told a german girl walked up to our guide, tears running down her face, and said "But it wasn't me." Blaming modern Germany for something that happened 62-67 years ago by the hands of a madman is a bit silly, yes. Jewish or not, many people suffered back then and holding a generation that is allready struggeling heavily with its past responsible for what happened then is a little silly.
As for Bayern Munich, they are in Germany what Spurs are in England when it comes to that kind of history.
Wikipedia:
"The advent of Nazism put an abrupt end to Bayern's development. The president and the coach, both of whom were Jewish, left the country. Many others in the club were also purged. Bayern was taunted as the "Jew's club" and as a semi-professional club Bayern was also affected by the ruling that football players had to be full amateurs again. In the following years Bayern could not sustain its role of contender for the national title, achieving mid-table results in its regional league instead."
I think you are quite safe to support Bayern Munich against Chelsea.
How much have they bankrolled them, Is it to the near Billion that City and Chelsea have done, and is it in as short a time.
I'd hazard a guess that its nowhere on the level of Chelsea and City.
Also, Yes I'd have animosity towards those Milan clubs if I was a supporter of a team that is as big on a standing as them. Maybe Roma, that hasn't had the same sort of funding.
And if Joe Lewis had dipped into his bank account and bought us three top players and we'd won the league how would you feel then?
Yes football has gone to hell in a handcart thanks to billionaire investors but remember we have one ourselves. Without his money where would Spurs be now?
Considering it's the same chumps that were proclaiming loudly that we'd blown top four a month ago, I thought they'd be PLEASED that they were proven wrong and that in the last 4 games we W3 D1. But I now realise that even if we'd got 3rd today they'd have moaned about us making hard work of it.
Bottom line? It's the same posters over and over again. If we win a game? They find fault, and moan. If we drew a game? We should have won, and they moan. If we lose a game? The Manager HAS to go, and they moan.
well Berlosconi arrived at AC in 86, and within 3 years they were winning the European Cup with Gullit, Rijkaard and Van Basten on the expensive payroll
Moratti has spent over 600 million pounds in his time at Inter, oil money too, dont forget that it was his father who funded Inter's earlier glory period in the 50's and 60's with oil money
i think one day Ley and Lewis will put Spurs up for sale and a billionaire will waltz into WHL and start throwing his money around. Its always possible and i for one wont be crying about it. Its football, its business
I hate bricky etc and I think theyre a bunch of ****s.
What I will say though is what is the difference between Man bricky winning the title spending 200m in two seasons whilst Manure spending the same amount over three or four years? Just that bricky did it in a smaller period of time. I mean Manure spent a ton of money over a few seasons (Veron, Jones, Berbatov, Rooney, Rio, etc etc etc)
I think to win the title you need to spend the cash not only on transfers but on wages also.
I hate bricky etc and I think theyre a bunch of ****s.
What I will say though is what is the difference between Man bricky winning the title spending 200m in two seasons whilst Manure spending the same amount over three or four years? Just that bricky did it in a smaller period of time. I mean Manure spent a ton of money over a few seasons (Veron, Jones, Berbatov, Rooney, Rio, etc etc etc)
I think to win the title you need to spend the cash not only on transfers but on wages also.
You and everyone else seems to be missing a tiny, pretty insignificant point that I dont know what I'm bringing it up really, but Manchester fudging bricky were handed that money which had nothing to do with their club as a business. Manchester '8 points and they fudged it up' Utd didnt.
Had bricky spend this money through their business, I would take my hat off to them. It has nothing to do with who spends what, it has everything to do with where they got it from.
You and everyone else seems to be missing a tiny, pretty insignificant point that I dont know what I'm bringing it up really, but Manchester fudging bricky were handed that money which had nothing to do with their club as a business. Manchester '8 points and they fudged it up' Utd didnt.
Had bricky spend this money through their business, I would take my hat off to them. It has nothing to do with who spends what, it has everything to do with where they got it from.
Copied from the OMT - I'm glad for the city fans. The proper old school, 'watchin ur rival win title after title for 20 years with David James up front, supporters.
Yes its unfair how they've done it... but i'm glad for the old school, oasis idiot excluded.