not that Fulop is just a brick keeper that even Spurs decided wasnt good enough?
Either way he is going to suffer from this as no proper team will let him be their no.1 for a long time after this game.
not that Fulop is just a brick keeper that even Spurs decided wasnt good enough?
Mick Cooper in misses the point shocker! Practically every club in the 60's, 70's and 80's was bankrolled. Practically every club made a loss year in, year out and had to have its wealthy benefactor come and pay the debt off with their own funds.
City and Chelsea have taken it to extremes for sure, and I am happier for Spurs to try and do it the "right" way but let's not kid ourselves too much!
you arrogant sod
who's missed the point? The point has been about where the money has come from, and so my point to you was simple - where did the money we spent come from? Was it a sugar daddy , or was it money we earned or money we borrowed and paid back from what we earned?
far from me missing the point smartarse, I think its you that has missed the point.
Chelsea are definitely without Terry, Ramires, Mikel and Mierles. Luiz and Cahill are also doubtful and werent fit for today
If they're missing those 6 then their CB pairing will be makeshift at best (Ivanovic & Bosingwa?) with perhaps Ferreira at RB. Midfield would lack options as well
Plus they're effectively away from home
That said, I thought Barca would kill them!!
if Abramovich walks away, Chelski are in the bricker
And had Arsenal not blown it against Norwich, then we wouldn't have had the chance to even attempt to get third. And had we not blown a 10 point lead then Arsenal wouldn't have been in the position to finish 3rd. And if Arsenal hadn't have had such a dreadful start to the season then we wouldn't have been 10pts clear etc etc.
When will people learn football NEVER works that way? Or are Spurs fans just born moaners? #-o
Moonlit, on a purely 'emotional' level, can you not see why people are disappointed with not finishing 3rd?
I found all that quite exciting if I'm being honest...8-[
Sorry but thats just not right.
The Spurs board did what they had every right to do, and that was to use the money the club had earned - earned, not been given by some foreigner living off the fortune under his feet that his country needs the rest of the world to extract on his behalf,
to buy the players you have worked yourselves into a position to afford is a million percent right
to push up the price of crude oil, to ransom the world so you can spunk money away on a football team thousands of miles from your homeland, is buying a title you don't deserve to have.
particularly because of the corrosive effect that the stewardship of the club has had on British and world football.
It was wrong when Chelski did it, and its wrong now.
Now Keown is arguing that RVP should stay at Arsenal and be loyal, rather than go to Barca or Emirates Marketing Project and win something
At least Crooks is taking the tinkle out of him
Rio doesn't look very happy
Man Utd lost this league make no mistake.
Losing twice to Emirates Marketing Project and an 8 point lead in 5 matches at the end of the year?
Criminal
This reminds me a lot of when John Terry slipped over in Moscow - they had essentially won the CL, but he fell over
Today United basically won the title, then City scored TWO injury time goals - but if the first had hit the post or something, they would be getting all the accolades
But in my mind they both did essentially the same thing really, it all comes down to a tiny fraction of luck in the end
Calm down ladies. You know we'll all be grateful to City when they convince van Persie to sign a bumper contract!
=D>=D>=D>
Chelsea and Emirates Marketing Project's success will always be tainted. Will always have that asterix besides there name.