how do you know they have different ideals? I'm just curious cause i always thought that AVB learned alot from mourinho
plus it seemed like from what people said....that avb's porto was set up like mourinho's teams
dont follow. Plus how do you know what his ideals are?
based on how he set up with us and chelsea and porto i fail to see how his actions shows his he has similar ideals to brazil. Unless of course you me brazil that have a solid powerful robust core and finesse surrounding it...which is incorporated into what KD said anyway
Misspelling on my part...should've said 'cliches which ONCE surrounded him'...
I said 'like Brazil yesterday'...high-pressure, high-tempo game, effective use of possession, push the full-backs up, playmaking star with a free role from the left to wherever he wants with the team moving to accommodate, clever striker...this is clearly not a Brazil set up to samba their way to glory. It is a more effective, high-energy and combative Brazil, something of a hybrid between the Dunga-led 94 side and the 2002 side...
On a wider note, AVB's plan is clear and one I think we all like? Namely he obviously wants a squad of 25 players where EVERYONE can switch effortlessly between 2 or 3 formations/systems per game depending on what's needed. I feel AVB wants to be able to go from 4-3-3 to 4-5-1 to 3-5-2 even (not necessarily THESE formations more the concept of swapping between 2-3 formations per match) and for that to happen you need everyone to be able to play 2 or 3 positions if needed. When I have time I'll break down how I see the squad in that sense... thus the upgrades to the squad he desires and is making...I think its interesting and somewhat excellent.
when does a team change from having several individual players providing the style/finesse/entertainment by themselves in to a side which has that incorporated in to tactics from the outset?
From reading about him - anyone that knows his career suggests he prefers a much more fluid style compared to Mourinho.
I'm sure he did learn a lot from Mourinho, but he's also very much his own man and has his own preferences. I too would describe us as effective last year rather than fluid, but I think that was out of necessity rather than design.
Misspelling on my part...should've said 'cliches which ONCE surrounded him'...
I said 'like Brazil yesterday'...high-pressure, high-tempo game, effective use of possession, push the full-backs up, playmaking star with a free role from the left to wherever he wants with the team moving to accommodate, clever striker...this is clearly not a Brazil set up to samba their way to glory. It is a more effective, high-energy and combative Brazil, something of a hybrid between the Dunga-led 94 side and the 2002 side...
On a wider note, AVB's plan is clear and one I think we all like? Namely he obviously wants a squad of 25 players where EVERYONE can switch effortlessly between 2 or 3 formations/systems per game depending on what's needed. I feel AVB wants to be able to go from 4-3-3 to 4-5-1 to 3-5-2 even (not necessarily THESE formations more the concept of swapping between 2-3 formations per match) and for that to happen you need everyone to be able to play 2 or 3 positions if needed. When I have time I'll break down how I see the squad in that sense... thus the upgrades to the squad he desires and is making...I think its interesting and somewhat excellent.
but then his team at porto that had industry through the centre, lack of pure flair / creative players through the middle and had the flair and craft on the wings with over lapping full backs
it was the same as mourinho
and then he comes to us and he pretty much does the same thing
i dont know. its one thing saying stuff, its another to implement it.
Moutinho isn't really a creative flair player.
No? Then why was everyone tossing over him last summer about him being that creative player who would be the last piece to the puzzle?
Who actually plays with a midfield play-maker these days? They're so rare, I think you could possibly name them on your two hands:
Pirlo
Carrick
Alonso
Xavi
Even Rodgers the idealist abandoned the "Joe Allen experiment" half way through the season which interestingly enough coincided with Liverpool's up-turn in form as everything didn't HAVE to go through a slow-coach deep in midfield before it "happened"...he decided instead to get the ball quicker and more directly to Coutinho, Sturridge and Suarez so the opposition defences didn't have a chance to set themselves while the "play-maker" decided what he wanted to do with the ball.
Oh and the other thing is that play-makers tend to just get a defensive midfielder from the opposition placed on them with the sole instruction to boot him up in the air as many times as he can without getting red carded...
Who actually plays with a midfield play-maker these days? They're so rare, I think you could possibly name them on your two hands:
Pirlo
Carrick
Alonso
Xavi
Even Rodgers the idealist abandoned the "Joe Allen experiment" half way through the season which interestingly enough coincided with Liverpool's up-turn in form as everything didn't HAVE to go through a slow-coach deep in midfield before it "happened"...he decided instead to get the ball quicker and more directly to Coutinho, Sturridge and Suarez so the opposition defences didn't have a chance to set themselves while the "play-maker" decided what he wanted to do with the ball.
Oh and the other thing is that play-makers tend to just get a defensive midfielder from the opposition placed on them with the sole instruction to boot him up in the air as many times as he can without getting red carded...
Do you feel that Tom Huddlestone still has a place within avb's squad?
the second paragraph is the desire of most top technical coaches...even JOl was trying to build that with us. Not really revoltuionary, but it is excellent none the less