BrainOfLevy
Michael Carrick
Re: ***The Official AVB Discussion Thread***
I think there is evidence - to be honest it goes exactly how I thought it would. We raise our intensity for big games and away games, while playing at a slower tempo against lesser teams. We will always therefore look the way we do roughly - it's just we should get a bit better at the slower tempo part as players learn they still need to be concentrated. We got results last year and we were doing ok this time around until a bad few weeks knocked some confidence. But to say that someone needs more time naturally lends itself to giving that person leniency in the face of bad results. How do you give them time without being lenient?
This approach delivered us record points last year. People can say 'Bale' but at the same time we didn't have a mid-table squad, he also didn't inherit Bale, the 86 million pound player. He inherited a player that had talent and gave him a platform to exploit that week by week. Last year for me is evidence enough that the approach he advocates will work (yes we had a good squad, and a world class Bale for half a season, but we also lost Modric, Van der Vaart and King and replaced them with Sigurdsson, Dempsey and a new to the league Verts. To then get record points is a pretty fantastic achievement. He's earned the right this year, in such a tight league, to have the time to see how he can do with all of these new players.
I get that he needs time, but there shouldn't be more lenience towards him if results are bad and there isn't evidence of our play improving despite pro AVB posters insistence that we are playing well after terrible results. It's well and good saying things will come good, but I judge this on performances and results, not my personal belief in the manager.
I do believe some people overstate the job he was given and the state of the club when he took over. Fair enough we needed to get shot of certain players, but we still had a core squad that was top 6 material at worst. It's almost like they believe we were a struggling mid table side when he took over. Granted we lost some key players, but we had just finished 4th, not 14th.
I think there is evidence - to be honest it goes exactly how I thought it would. We raise our intensity for big games and away games, while playing at a slower tempo against lesser teams. We will always therefore look the way we do roughly - it's just we should get a bit better at the slower tempo part as players learn they still need to be concentrated. We got results last year and we were doing ok this time around until a bad few weeks knocked some confidence. But to say that someone needs more time naturally lends itself to giving that person leniency in the face of bad results. How do you give them time without being lenient?
This approach delivered us record points last year. People can say 'Bale' but at the same time we didn't have a mid-table squad, he also didn't inherit Bale, the 86 million pound player. He inherited a player that had talent and gave him a platform to exploit that week by week. Last year for me is evidence enough that the approach he advocates will work (yes we had a good squad, and a world class Bale for half a season, but we also lost Modric, Van der Vaart and King and replaced them with Sigurdsson, Dempsey and a new to the league Verts. To then get record points is a pretty fantastic achievement. He's earned the right this year, in such a tight league, to have the time to see how he can do with all of these new players.