No, and that's been proven to be potentially one of the worst decisions ever made by anyone in the club's history.
The first step should have been ensuring you had an adequate replacement structure in place. Honestly ENIC behaved like some people on this board, "just change everything", no strategy, no plan, just fudging hope, somehow, magically, it will get better and it almost destroyed the club (not hyperbole, dropping into championship would have been a disaster that we might never have really recovered from).
And if we don't already have brick locked up re Paratici's replacement, re how to either replace Vinai and Lange or minimize limit their decision scope moving forward, we have already fudged up again.
And there still is the real question, who runs this club? I don't see Vinai taking that role, so is it Charrington? is it one of the family? You can highlight Levy fudge ups as much as you want, but you knew who made most decisions and who would take the flack for it. Why the fudge did Vinai not do the end of season letter? it comes across as cowardice and someone who is unable/unwilling to take control.
In some big corporate roles, you have responsibility without specifically stated authority, it's one of the toughest things to deal with as an executive, but it's also a measure of you. Sometimes you need to, you are expected to, take that authority without anyone "blessing" it. Vinai has failed miserably at stepping in, taking authority, making decisions, even the end of season letter is something he should have said "let me take it, I was part of the problem, I have to own some of this"