johnola
Vedran Corluka
which i why i specifically asked about passenger travel.Freight
which i why i specifically asked about passenger travel.Freight
which i why i specifically asked about passenger travel.
That might be a bit much - you have to allow voters to choose. It should trigger a by-election certainly. And probably come with a ban (lengthy, maybe permanent) from holding any serious office.Bang up for that
Also anyone caught breaking ministerial codes, thats it you are gone, go be a postman, you are done..............
That might be a bit much - you have to allow voters to choose. It should trigger a by-election certainly. And probably come with a ban (lengthy, maybe permanent) from holding any serious office.
That's also pay related though.I think ethics is the largest stumbling block to decent politics these days, to many either slipping the net or not being dealt with in a fashion that clearly puts off dodgy dealings in the future.
Everyone seems to have a grift currently
That's also pay related though.
MPs get paid a pittance and can lose their job overnight. They have to have somewhere to land.
The job may pay a pittance, not sure I agree but that's a discussion for another time, but there's no way the majority of the MPs could pick up or hold onto a job with a salary like that in the real world.That's also pay related though.
MPs get paid a pittance and can lose their job overnight. They have to have somewhere to land.
Talking of manifestos.
One of the simplest and greatest improvements to our political system would be to automatically trigger an election if manifesto promises are broken.
Then don't make promises that they can't keep.I think that would be silly.
We get another pandemic, or an official war, and it would throw the country into chaos.
Then don't make promises that they can't keep.
It's not what they do that's the issue, it's what they promise to a gullible electorate.
Surely if the landscape changes significantly, then an election wouldn't be out of order.The entire economic foundation could change for reasons outside the government’s control.
To trigger an election on something like number of teachers hired or new houses built would be churlish.
Surely if the landscape changes significantly, then an election wouldn't be out of order.
Imagine if Labour had won the election in 2008. We'd currently be asking Argentina for handouts.
Student Unions up and down the land are saying 'here here!'So agree a cross-party consensus on taxing the 450 people who own half the country's wealth?
Talking of manifestos.
One of the simplest and greatest improvements to our political system would be to automatically trigger an election if manifesto promises are broken.
I think ethics is the largest stumbling block to decent politics these days, to many either slipping the net or not being dealt with in a fashion that clearly puts off dodgy dealings in the future.
Everyone seems to have a grift currently
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.