Legohamster
Tom Huddlestone
are the accounts as dodgy as Chelseas?He's no longer in charge there. Been pushed out by accounts.
are the accounts as dodgy as Chelseas?He's no longer in charge there. Been pushed out by accounts.
That can't be right, replacing the manager mid season always works!
I completely disagree with this. I'm interested to hear what academies they are at.Having 2 kids in the football system. Academy and pre academy training is about making players that plug in to the system.
The stand out players don't stand out because of the education they get at clubs, they already had that before they were scouted. Everyone else technically good, strong and quick. Which of these your more weighted towards decides which position you'll play.
When was the last time England produced a Pirlo, Modric, Busquets type of player. Even Vitiniho for someone more recent?
Glasner, Eze and Mateta would be welcome.Glasner could be in the reckoning...Palace certainly well set up.
He was doing very good things in Germany with Frankfurt tooGlasner could be in the reckoning...Palace certainly well set up.
I like the swagger of this young man. Sign him up.Great goals from Mateta and Eze, feels like ages since our front line last scored a worldie.
I completely disagree with this. I'm interested to hear what academies they are at.
The clubs I visited when doing my coaching badges were all about skill and technique. Nobody was getting turned into a tricky winger. However, players were learning about what it took to play across most positions and encouraged to always do something positive with the ball.
Interesting that you asked the question of when was the last time England produced one of those players, yet it has been much more recently that the coaching in England has become much more aligned to that in the rest of Europe.
30 years ago, it was incredibly difficult for a Modric type player to come through in England. The academies were far too concerned with winning games and that was often achieved by physicality and playing the percentages. Modric would've been weeded out as being too small. Nowadays most of the academies (certainly the better ones) aren't looking at the results and are instead looking to create players with great touch, who can play with their heads up. Smaller, skillful players are given much more time to develop and have a far better chance of making it.
I completely disagree with this. I'm interested to hear what academies they are at.
The clubs I visited when doing my coaching badges were all about skill and technique. Nobody was getting turned into a tricky winger. However, players were learning about what it took to play across most positions and encouraged to always do something positive with the ball.
Interesting that you asked the question of when was the last time England produced one of those players, yet it has been much more recently that the coaching in England has become much more aligned to that in the rest of Europe.
30 years ago, it was incredibly difficult for a Modric type player to come through in England. The academies were far too concerned with winning games and that was often achieved by physicality and playing the percentages. Modric would've been weeded out as being too small. Nowadays most of the academies (certainly the better ones) aren't looking at the results and are instead looking to create players with great touch, who can play with their heads up. Smaller, skillful players are given much more time to develop and have a far better chance of making it.
What percentage of a kids football exposure are they being coached though. The lions share of it would be them out with their mates down the park/street or in the back garden etc.
And I reckon most of the kids that turn out half decent are because they are playing down the park with one or more really good players. If you are already the top boy and you are actually brick then you can forget it.