• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Definitely not an out of car window Transfer Thread

Has Gil done enough for Conte/Paratici to no longer wanting or prioritising another right sided attacking option?

Would be a lot of trust put in young Gil in that case. But he's looked up to the task recently when given the chance. Will be interesting to see what happens.
 
braineclipse said:
Has Gil done enough for Conte/Paratici to no longer wanting or prioritising another right sided attacking option?

Would be a lot of trust put in young Gil in that case. But he's looked up to the task recently when given the chance. Will be interesting to see what happens.
Click to expand...

I think he possibly has, or at least defer that decision til the summer

Having a more natural replacement for Son perhaps is more critical in attacking areas, and then ditching Moura?
 
papaspur said:
Chelsea signed Datro Fofana from Molde... I mentioned him about five weeks ago in this thread. Plays mainly as a striker, but could have been decent cover for the front-3 in an injury crisis while he develops.
Click to expand...
He'll never play a competitive game for Chelsea. Didn't stand out at all in the Norwegian league, which is utter brick, so he's nowhere near PL level, and I doubt he'll ever be.
 
AdamB said:
I think he possibly has, or at least defer that decision til the summer

Having a more natural replacement for Son perhaps is more critical in attacking areas, and then ditching Moura?
Click to expand...

I think Richarlison is that player personally.

Difficult to know with Moura, he's been a decent option at times. But now injured for a while and definitely not a great fit.

Perhaps Gil doing well means that there's less pressure on a short term attacking solution at least. Doesn't have to be someone ready made.

If our interest in Malinovskyi was real that would explain us "letting him move" without pushing for him.

Son, Kane, Kulusevski, Richarlison, Gil +1 would be good. Looks a bit light with just those 5. But no idea who that one player should be.
 
braineclipse said:
I think Richarlison is that player personally.

Difficult to know with Moura, he's been a decent option at times. But now injured for a while and definitely not a great fit.

Perhaps Gil doing well means that there's less pressure on a short term attacking solution at least. Doesn't have to be someone ready made.

If our interest in Malinovskyi was real that would explain us "letting him move" without pushing for him.

Son, Kane, Kulusevski, Richarlison, Gil +1 would be good. Looks a bit light with just those 5. But no idea who that one player should be.
Click to expand...
I was sure we would go in for Currasco who can play wing back and wide forward but that’s not materialised so far

I said it earlier in the week that Ishmail Sarr is a perfect fit for us IMO and he has his country mate here too, to help him settle
 
Bedfordspurs said:
I was sure we would go in for Currasco who can play wing back and wide forward but that’s not materialised so far

I said it earlier in the week that Ishmail Sarr is a perfect fit for us IMO and he has his country mate here too, to help him settle
Click to expand...

Think Carrasco would be a good, flexible option. But probably fairly expensive for his age? Wouldn't be surprised if he's on Paratici's list.

I like Sarr. Can do a job on both sides too? Would be fairly expensive though? And I'm not sure he has the potential to step up to become a clear first choice one day.

Wonder if Gil doing as well as he has done may give us the option of going younger and with even more future potential than Sarr?
 
Gutter Boy said:
I. Sarr only has 18 months on his contract. He'd probably be gettable for about £20m
Click to expand...
What does he do exactly? for someone highly rated with premier league experience playing in a league lower than he should be, he has not exactly got the greatest of stats.

I feel he has an awkward technique that almost looks clumsy (kind of like sissoko) and his passing isn't wonderful. I don't get what he adds that someone like Parrot doesn't.
 
Last edited:
Yiddo said:
What does he do exactly? for someone highly rated with premier league experience playing in a league lower than he should be, he has not exactly got the greatest of stats.

I feel he has an awkward technique that almost looks clumsy (kind of like sissoko) and his passing isn't wonderful. I don't get what he adds that someone like Parrot doesn't.
Click to expand...
Experience
Goals
Proven ability
International experience
Pretty much everything that parrot doesn’t have
 
braineclipse said:
Think Carrasco would be a good, flexible option. But probably fairly expensive for his age? Wouldn't be surprised if he's on Paratici's list.

I like Sarr. Can do a job on both sides too? Would be fairly expensive though? And I'm not sure he has the potential to step up to become a clear first choice one day.

Wonder if Gil doing as well as he has done may give us the option of going younger and with even more future potential than Sarr?
Click to expand...

18m left on his contract
Would think it would be £20m ish
Gil can one uh dream of scoring 1 goal in 3 game currently
He will end up dropping deeper imo
 
Wary of us building up an old squad which they needs another rebuild when Conte leaves. I'd prefer us to stick to mainly signing players who are under 25ish buying 3-4 per year

Carrasco is a good player, but would prefer Porro as a WB and Sarr as a wide forward
 
AdamB said:
Wary of us building up an old squad which they needs another rebuild when Conte leaves. I'd prefer us to stick to mainly signing players who are under 25ish buying 3-4 per year

Carrasco is a good player, but would prefer Porro as a WB and Sarr as a wide forward
Click to expand...
I would too
 
Bedfordspurs said:
Experience
Goals
Proven ability
International experience
Pretty much everything that parrot doesn’t have
Click to expand...
Goals - Not many for someone who is rated as well as him.
Proven ability - i suppose, but some may say Royale has proven ability.
International experience - So has Parrot to be fair.
I just don’t think spending money on someone like that is going to be the sensible thing to do whilst blocking another academy player from trying to progress. If Sarr was free then i can see it but i don’t think he is worth getting if money is involved.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back