I've not received a penny for any of my shares, don't see how that last bit can be right.
Atlanta Yid on COYS:
As for the profit of the club all the money that ENIC invested in the club has been made back in terms of profit the club makes money for all of its share holders.
The club has always been run like a business and always will be. If Joe decided to sell the club tomorrow every penny would come in the way of profit.
PROF on COYS:
Another present for the COYS night shift. Off we go. This snippet is a mixture of information received over the last 12 hours from Galahad, Gabe, and several other sources, on both sides of the pond. The only point of difference between their snippets is whether DL has signed.
Deal signed by NFL and now sitting on DL's desk awaiting his autograph, for a subset of international NFL games to be played at THFC.
Wembley likely to continue hosting some of the international NFL games too.
Expected that next week's owner's meeting will approve this two site approach. Makes sense for the NFL to have options/leverage.
It is possible they owners won't green light this deal, or that DL will try something tricky that will cause the other side to lose confidence. In many ways DL is offering the most (stadium/facilities/marketing) in this deal, but also may have the most to lose (the financial benefit to THFC is large), so he is expected to play it straight, or at least as straight as he can in the circumstances (dealing with a behemoth like the NFL).
One thing about our situation that very much appeals to the NFL is the opportunity for a purpose-built stadium (pitch, facilities, etc). Wembley can't offer that (although they have the transport links) and this is an important selling point for many owners.
WHL will be a dual purpose stadium. Obviously our usage will be the lion's share, so we get the main pitch, which we won't share with the NFL. Instead, there will be a retractable pitch {see HSH forum for details and perhaps pictures - Prof} used for NFL games.
Based on precedent, expect on-site marketing to be tightly restricted; perhaps only Spurs, the new stadium sponsors and the NFL allowed to advertise.
Under the terms of the contract signed by DL this evening, financially it will be a good deal for us. Well played Danny.
Thanks to every one of Galahad's sources on this. It takes an understanding of the passion of Spurs fans to want to share interesting information with fellow COYSers, and humility not to need to post it under their own names. These people are not craving attention, but are acting on their instincts as true Spurs fans, and they (not me --- I know nothing about anything) deserve the gratitude of those who appreciate their efforts.
i've had a couple of very small cheques over the years
love the look of it - very German.
Atlanta Yid on COYS:
What I do know is that Joe Lewis is a HUGE NFL fan he has tried to but to NFL teams in the past and has been turned down.
The main reason that he was turned down had something to do with how much he likes to gamble on the game.
The NFL does not take to kindly to gambling on sports when you are part of the game.
That being said Joe wants and has tried to get the NFL franchise in London he has been working on this deal for a long time.
He not only feels like it would be a great opportunity for him to own another sports team but it would grow the brand of Tottenham Hotspur.
As for the profit of the club all the money that ENIC invested in the club has been made back in terms of profit the club makes money for all of its share holders.
The club has always been run like a business and always will be. If Joe decided to sell the club tomorrow every penny would come in the way of profit.
I've not received a penny for any of my shares, don't see how that last bit can be right.
yeah Levy time, i've had one in the last 3 years, probably two in the 4 before that
i've still got them somewhere, they were for pennies
According to the Annual Reports, there was a dividend of 4p per share for the year ending 30 June 2007, a further dividend of 4p per share for the year ending 30 June 2008, totalling about £3.7 million each, most of which would have gone to ENIC, and nothing for 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014. From memory there was very little if anything in the way of dividend between 2001 when ENIC took over, and 2006. Atlanta Yid's comments smack of opinion rather than knowledge. That said, if ENIC sell up, you can rest assured they won't do it at a loss.
lol, its not pennies haha. I have 2000 shares. I'd better ring my brother.
Is that you Ade?lol, its not pennies haha. I have 2000 shares. I'd better ring my brother.
The Applicant, in its capacity as landowner of the site, wishes to demolish the existing building to clear the site in preparation for future redevelopment.
TfL has assumed that these minor changes proposed will not allow the stadium to be able to facilitate any long term scenarios that were not considered at application stage with the exception of tournament football as stated by the planning statement. It would be beneficial if this assumption could be confirmed by the applicant. Nevertheless, in that context TfL supports that condition 17 of the extant consent restricts the number of non football events per annum to four and is not proposed to be amended or removed. In summary, TfL and based on the assumptions made above TfL has no objections to the proposed s73.
It's not right - it's bullsh1t, just like the rest of the post.