• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The "Official" 2013/14 Other teams matches thread

ManU is getting their asses handed to them by Shaktar, outplayed in every aspect of the game. It's beautiful.

Sent from my HTC One using Fapatalk
 
chancer said:
Andy fking Townsend.

Says United are missing Carrick in front of back 4. Fair enough comment. Except his reasoning is up his hole: he says he's needed there because at the moment there's no service to Rooney and Kagawa from midfield because the midfield are passing backwards and laterally. So he's essentially saying if Carrick were in front of the back 4 he'd be supplying the front 2.

My take: Townsend has heard the chatter on forums and backpages in recent weeks about United missing Carrick but he completely lacks the analytical ability to draw the correct conclusion from that.

I'm turning over to Masterchef.
Click to expand...

I am sick of pundits just telling what they see. AT is a classic "should have done better there" guy.

Why can't we have someone giving technical detail or even some good old fashioned honest opinion?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back