braineclipse
Steve Sedgley
Sure, no one's saying we can attract Bale back to the club or anything - the general point I was making was that the more expensive transfers usually end up being more successful than the cheaper signings. The reason why clubs with 'buy low, sell high' strategies and recruitment teams that build squads of cheap but effective players are so lauded is precisely because such phenomena tend to be unusual - on the whole, if the market prices a player lower than another, there's generally (generally) a reason for that which manifests itself in some inherent disadvantage the player possesses relative to his more expensive counterpart.
Personally, I think we did a good job last summer in picking up some great players. Toby cost 13.5 million quid (iirc), and I was delighted to get him, since it was transparently obvious that he should have cost a lot more given his outstanding season with Soton and that he'd form a great partnership with Jan. Son cost 22.5 million quid and I was still delighted to get him, since (to my mind) that's the sort of quality we should be aiming to fill the squad with as much as possible, and there was no doubting that he was talented (could use both feet, quick, clinical, relentless runner, great inside-forward), young and seemingly unattainable prior to our move for him (what with him being at Leverkusen, a club with CL football).
There's certainly grounds for concern if the summer was filled with 'great value' signings alone, but only because previous instances of such transfers have been a very mixed bag - for every Dier and Alli, there has been a Stambouli, Fazio, Saha or Nelsen who genuinely were bargain bins in every sense of the term. While Dier and Alli might herald a new era of *only* making smart value signings, I'm not sure they signify a trend just yet, and would thus be concerned if that was all they did. But another summer like the one we had in 2015 wouldn't faze me at all, and I'd be more than happy with that.
Part of my point is that although we do not wish to see ourselves as a "selling club" (buy low, well high strategy) or "recruitment team" we must continue doing what has given us an edge - player development. We can mix this with some high profile signing if the deal is right. But if we aren't able to continue our player development (both of signed and academy players) I think we will ultimately struggle. We're looking to replicate Dortmund and Atletico Madrid imo, we cannot expect to compete with teams with much bigger budgets by going toe to toe with them in the transfer market.
I like Son too, good signing. Now is the time to develop him further. He's had a stop start and up and down first season, he'll be better for it. The strange thing is that if we had signed "another Son" this summer at a similar level for a similar cost people would see this as "making a statement of intent" or "showing ambition". But if we instead say "nope, no need to sign that new player, we're going to develop Son further" while perhaps adding a £5-10m young player to the mix that's somehow problematic going by quite a few comments being made.
Just like there's been a Stambouli, Fazio, Saha or Nelsen (I actually rated Nelsen and both Stambouli and Fazio were decent-ish signings) for every Modric or Berbatov there's clearly been a Rebrov, Paulinho and Soldado for every Lamela. And for Son's talent and potential our current top 5 most expensive signings ever (not adjusted for football inflation) are Soldado, Lamela, Son, Paulinho and Darrent Bent. Not quite the 66-75% success rate you're looking for. Top 10 gives you perhaps a 50% hit rate at best.
I agree on another summer like the one in 2015 being absolutely fine.