i want zaha. or some magic feet.
Given the season we've had and our qualification for the CL, I would hope we can get someone better than Zaha. I agree though that we need another player in those attacking positions behind Kane
i want zaha. or some magic feet.
I'd be happy with Zaha.Given the season we've had and our qualification for the CL, I would hope we can get someone better than Zaha. I agree though that we need another player in those attacking positions behind Kane
Exactly!As much as I rate Harry Kane I will never understand why a number of you are satisfied with just signing a striker that is happy to sit on the bench and be a "backup" to Harry and not sign a player of greater ability who could be real competition for Harry. It means when Harry is off his game like he was today, or when he is injured, suspended or tired there will be a steep drop in quality. Ideally I would rather they also have the option to play together as well. I think both Walker and Rose raised their game even more this season when they had faced competition for their spot
Agreed, although I think Carroll's contract expires this summer and I do not think it will be renewed, hopefully that means we will bring in a midfielder that will really compete with Demele and or Dier
As much as I rate Harry Kane I will never understand why a number of you are satisfied with just signing a striker that is happy to sit on the bench and be a "backup" to Harry and not sign a player of greater ability who could be real competition for Harry
just thinking about our investment Paul Mitchell and his 'player data army' - does it mean that we have to trade to justify their costs/existence?
if so i wonder what is their break even point, considering that we have also made heavy investments in our academy infrastructure.
Interesting stuff. Where did you read this?.... As I don't think I have seen anything that suggests this and would be keen to read up on it.Actually one of the data team's main tasks is to show that academy players are ready and we don't need to buy.
Or how to improve our existing player - e.g. if Walker played 1 meter further left, he'd win 4.3% more interceptions etc. That's the sort of level they work on.
They work across the academy, first team squad and third party players and run all their algorithms and modelling across the lot.
Interesting stuff. Where did you read this?.... As I don't think I have seen anything that suggests this and would be keen to read up on it.
If I was at Spurs my transfer policy would take a simple shape....
120m on three top top quality players.
Finance is already in place for the ground, the new TV deal means its money time for clubs and we have increased revenue from CL to look forward to.
Considering also our spend in last 12 months has been low I would be confident to have finances in the bank already for recruitment.
Players on books will get pay rises anyway from CL qualification, I would not be shocked to see 15% across board
Finance is already in place for the ground, the new TV deal means its money time for clubs and we have increased revenue from CL to look forward to.
Considering also our spend in last 12 months has been low I would be confident to have finances in the bank already for recruitment.
Players on books will get pay rises anyway from CL qualification, I would not be shocked to see 15% across board
Your confidence is misplaced. If you look at our financial results over the past few years you'll see that we don't have the finances in the bank already for recruitment of anywhere near the level that you are suggesting. Theoretically we could borrow that sort of amount to throw at player recruitment, but that would seriously impact our ability to borrow money at a reasonable rate to pay for our stadium build.Finance is already in place for the ground, the new TV deal means its money time for clubs and we have increased revenue from CL to look forward to.
Considering also our spend in last 12 months has been low I would be confident to have finances in the bank already for recruitment.
Players on books will get pay rises anyway from CL qualification, I would not be shocked to see 15% across board
If I was at Spurs my transfer policy would take a simple shape....
120m on three top top quality players.
Your policy fails from the get go because it is based on the monetary value of the player.
Indeed why spend £10-12m on Toby because you want to spend £120m so you spunk £32m on Eliaquim Mangala, or why spend. Emirates Marketing Project also decided to spend £50m on Sterling, because that was obvious the best use of that money. It is a myth if you think that you have to spend £120m to sign 3 quality players.