Finney Is Back
Luka Modric
It's not harking back to anything. It's simply looking at a current gap in our squad and identifying a player who might fit that gap. We currently are a little short of experience in the team, we currently have only one player who is a natural in the holding midfield role despite our system being completely reliant on having a holding player, we (I assume) only have limited transfer funds and we are probably going to have to hit the ground running next season if we want to challenge again. Diarra to cover Dier might be a sensible option.It's just harking back to the Redknapp days to want old timers for their 'character'. That's just not how Poch does it. He's the leader and he needs young malleable players who will be subservient to his will. I can't see a 31 YO midfielder having the legs for our system at all.
Tielemans is the worst hyped because he's good on FM player I've seen since Shaqiri. Everytime I see him play (including twice against us this season, he's the obvious weak link alongside journeymen like Defour. In fact Dendoncker is the talented midfielder at Anderlecht
Personally I don't think there is a particular need for our holding midfield player to "have legs" (and of course I mean that in the way that you were putting it as opposed to literally). The game that Dier plays is mainly one that requires a combination of good positional awareness married with excellent positional discipline, with the ability to tackle well and to be a reasonable but not spectacular passer of the ball. Diarra would seem to have all of these attributes so could be a good, short-ish term, experienced, proven in the PL and CL, zero transfer fee, fit for that role in the squad. Personally I would rather we signed Wanyama for this role as he would offer a proper challenge to Dier for a first team spot and be a longer term signing, but he is another that you have poo-poo'd us signing (despite the fact that his game is remarkably similar to Dier's).
Regarding Tielemans - to say that he is the obvious weak link is stretching things a little. I thought that Anderlecht were at least on par with us at WHL and unlucky to lose to Dembele's late goal. In the away match we steamrollered them early on but they then came into the game and deserved at least a share of the spoils. Something to consider here is that Tielemans was only 18 years old in those two games. Being able to hold your own (which is something he regularly does) in the centre of midfield at only 18 isn't something to be taken lightly, in fact one of the reasons that I want us to keep Bentaleb is the fact that he was able to hold his own in that position for us at 19.
I find it strange that you can write off Tielemans as simply being FM hype despite the fact that he only turned 19 last week? Personally I don't see the need for us to bring him in at Spurs as we already have Bentaleb who plays a similar type of game, but it is foolish to write Tielemans off as a poor player and if there is an issue with Bentaleb's discipline and willingness to toe Poch's teamwork line and we are looking to offload him as a result, then Tielemans might be an option to bring in to take up that place in the squad.
It is also interesting that you write off Diarra as "harking back to the Redknapp days" but equally you don't want Tielemans despite him clearly being a "young, malleable player who would be subservient to his will"? Is it just that you want to keep Bentaleb and Mason in the first team squad no matter what?