The problem will be that this election will deny us a vote on the final deal.
If people vote Tory, then that's what will happen. We can all choose to vote otherwise, if people don't then that's democracy.
If people vote Tory, then that's what will happen. We can all choose to vote otherwise, if people don't then that's democracy.
I don't think that there will be sufficient detail on what the government will seek from negotiations during the campaign for the electorate to make an informed decision.
lolelectorate to make an informed decision.
Well, we know that the Tories will say they don't want to be in the single market.
The Lib Dems could say they will not leave the EU and try and grab the votes of the 48%, a reverse UKIP.
Labour could say they would opt to stay in the single market whilst still leaving the EU.
Those 3 paths would obviously lead to very different negotiations, it's up to people to decide what road they want to go down.
The Tories will not stray from their "get the best possible deal for the UK" line which is meaningless.
But we know they want to leave the single market, that is an absolute. The Lib Dems and Labour can lay out their broad position on it (as I said, Lib Dems could say "we won't leave") and people can vote on the path they want the country to take.
Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron said: “April is set to be a humiliating month for May..."
I think that the official government line is membership of the single market without the electorate or their backbenchers noticing and without any of the bits that they don't like.
Labour doesn't have a line.
The Lib Dems clearly think that it is a bad idea and support a referendum on the outcome of negotiations.
Well, we will know what the party lines are for sure in the campaigning over the next couple of months. Broadly, Tory Hard Brexit, Labour softer Brexit and Lib Dem remain. And people will vote for what they want, coupled with policies on our national politics (I suspect for many people it will be all about brexit).
I think this is precisely why she is forcing the election. She could publicly stamp on the heads of babies with Corbyn as the opposition and increase her share of the vote.It's pure politics. She could have taken that stance at any time since she was elected but took the opposite.
The only crumb of comfort i can take from this is that a larger majority will make her less reliant on her headbanger back benchers and might give her the freedom to take a more pragmatic approach to our future relationship to the EU.
I think this is precisely why she is forcing the election. She could publicly stamp on the heads of babies with Corbyn as the opposition and increase her share of the vote.
This is just an internal Conservative power play and is another way of her edging out those who opposed her initially and continue to get in the way now. She'll be able to name her own cabinet and hopefully this time won't need to include many of those she was obliged to last time.
The issue is that i do not think that the implications of each will be properly explored and the Tories will be able to get away with saying that they want the best possible deal with the EU and global UK.
BTW I do not believe that May's stance is hard Brexit. I think that she was forced into that by some backbenchers and that she recognises that it would be suicide.
May's way of trying to exit Brexit. She's on a hiding to nothing with European fail, so had to do something. Quite clever of her really. She had no other way out...
This election will be another EU vote by poxy. Shambles.
I don't see anyone with any knowledge of politics suggesting this is the case.How/ can Labour get Blair, Blunket, Mandleson, and Cambell fast tracked for the election? With limp Corbyn could see Lib Dems sweeping Labour away. Biggest distraction tatics ever by May. EU negotiations look impossible...call an election! If it wasn't such a waste of UK time and energy it would be genius.