milo
Jack L. Jones
Is there a link to something of substance?
No. He has posted two threads of what he claims is inside info from No. 10. I have no idea whether his info is genuine.
Is there a link to something of substance?
It was the link to the threads that I meant, sorry!No. He has posted two threads of what he claims is inside info from No. 10. I have no idea whether his info is genuine.
It was the link to the threads that I meant, sorry!
Sent from my Nexus 5X using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
No, just the tweet, no link.You should get the thread when you click on the embedded Tweet.
No, just the tweet, no link.
I thought it was a spoof account - "fake news"....I say I have information, let people make up the truth.
No worries, I'm sure anything good will come out in the wash
Sent from my Nexus 5X using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
Good.
Good.
It's not something I want us to go through with, but it's a big fudging stick and we should make sure the EU see us wielding it.
I wasn't talking about walking out on negotiations - I was talking about the threat of not offering residency to EU nationals.It's being argued here that this approach would not be as simple as it first seems.
https://waitingfortax.com/2017/03/08/can-you-hear-the-drums-a-banging/
There seems to be a lot of talk about the possibility of no deal. Whether that's just people briefing against the govt and agitating, or the govt seeking to normalise that position, I don't know, but it *feels* like that shadow is softly creeping.
Am I right in thinking that we can't just revert to WTO terms but have (re)apply to join?
If so, what happens during the interim period (out of the EU, not yet in WTO) or can the withdrawal/rejoin overlap?
I wasn't talking about walking out on negotiations - I was talking about the threat of not offering residency to EU nationals.
The article you linked to relies on parliament having the stomach to go against the public will and not pre-authorise May to leave when required. I think very few MPs do, and it would be very damaging for those who joined them.
I'd rather we used every bit of leverage we have to ensure those thoroughly untrustworthy fudgers can't screw us over.I'd prefer it it we, as a country, did not phuck with people's lives this way. Regardless of what the EU want to do with UK citizens abroad, we should do the decent thing and re-assure those people already here that they will be able to stay and carry on with their lives. Leaving them in limbo is totally wrong.
I'd rather we used every bit of leverage we have to ensure those thoroughly untrustworthy fudgers can't screw us over.
We don't have to do it, we just have to convince them we're willing to.
There is certainly the risk of encouraging that unwanted element.I understand what you are saying, but I don't think we should be using people as leverage in this way. Negotiate hard on all the other aspects, sure, but I want to see us take the moral high ground on this one. Also, I don't want to see us feed the "send them all back" sentiment of the far right.
I may have completely misunderstood the law, but don't they get a referendum when we say they get a referendum?So now the SNP have called for a second Indy Ref and with the Green's support, the Scottish Parliament will vote for it.
I may have completely misunderstood the law, but don't they get a referendum when we say they get a referendum?
I may have completely misunderstood the law, but don't they get a referendum when we say they get a referendum?