Thanks for responding, I'm going to reply, although I'm conscious that a) this won't be formatted particularly well and b) you and others may be fed up with my stance on Derp Hopefully you'll understand a bit more about my reason for wanting to provide balance given the antisemitic backlash that is happening right now in the UK.
On the suggestion that Germany ....
No not a joke. It was Germanys crime (not a strong enough word) against the Jews of Europe they should have had to pay. German population should have been moved out of an area in Germany and Jewish people settle there. As a Jewish state.
There were plenty of open spaces in 1945 that they could have housed the few remaining Jews - dachau, buchenwald, mauthausen - I'm pretty sure that Germany wasn't the country that these people would have wanted to reside.... anyway, this is a side point
My question asking about what Israel should be doing...
The fact is that this "round" did not start with the thousands if rocket being fired in to Israel. It started with Bibi being under pressure for being a corruption... um person. So he ordered things Like steainl Palestinians homes and calling a raid on a Mosque while people are praying... totally expecting and getting a reaction... do you really believe that is a coincidence?
"They started it..." OK...
But if the response, that is being (rightly) condemned, to the thousands of rockets is wrong - what should they do instead? Serious question. What would be the acceptable response from Israel?
On to your metaphor the little annoying pri ck didn't start hitting you In the bollo cks for no reason. Stop giving a reason to punch you in the bolloc ks and I will go round with you and give him a slap if he does it again.
Before this 'round', there have been plenty of back and forth 'strikes'... this goes back decades.
I know that the response will be: "but these people are acting out of desperation, so they're only kicking in order to get what they feel is rightfully theirs" ...
Hamas are c unts. There is no justified reason for targeting civilians. But I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) even they say they would recognise Israel and 1947 boarders (that's not reasonable 1967 is though imho).
You are wrong...hamas’s charter is the end of the state of Israel full stop, and I quote: "the obliteration or dissolution of Israel", then the end of the Jews - huge amount of violent language about the Jews in the hamas charter...
So, whilst all the reasonable people (me included by the way) want a two state solution......
Israel can get rid of hamas (relatively) quicky. Just allow the the Palestinian to have a better alternative. Hamas are not in control of the west bank so what's the deal there?
No they can't... and yes hamas are in the west bank too
Bibi distraction - he is far from being a saint, far, far, far but he is no worse than almost all other leaders across the world and better than a lot of his peers in the middle East. Is he using this as a distraction technique? Possibly. Wouldn't put it past him. Would I like a leader of Israel that puts an end to the whole conflict? Yes. But as mentioned above, its not as simple as it sounds
Bibi is a lot lot worse than a most of the leaders across the world. He really is. I really dont understand why you don't see that.
Disagree, don't think we're going to resolve this one
On the dispute over jerusalem - I don't think you're going to agree with my answer but here it is - this land has been 'owned' by many different peoples over the centuries, I don't know who should 'own' it now. I'd personally prefer it if nobody owned it and everyone just lived there peacefully, but as above, that doesn't sound likely. Your point I guess is that there were a group of people living there contentedly and some other people waged a war and took the land from them... that has happened a LOT across the planet. Israel took one square mile of land and the world is in uproar. Why is that? What is the affinity to the previous residents? I'd understand if you lived there or a member of your family, but I'm guessing that's not the case. For example, do you care that my great- grandparents generation were forcibly removed from Poland & Russia (the
pogroms (see link)- this is not just about the nazis remember)? Should we be given back that land?
Yeah I care what happened to your great grandparents. I would care even more if it was happening today. Where did they go to by the way?
And yes if there is proof of ownership you should be given back land
The pogroms forced Jews from Eastern Europe to Western Europe, North America and South America.
What do you mean proof of ownership of land? This is my point... should they have a receipt or something? They lived there, were forcibly removed and nobody that was unrelated to it directly batted an eyelid. Why would they? It was just a bunch of dirty Jews being moved along....
What do I think of the attack of the Mosque on the holiest night for the Muslims? Terrible, disgusting but in the context of what is happening I'm guessing (I could be wrong), that there was a reason for this and it wasn't just "let's bomb some praying Muslims for bricks and giggles". Whether it be that hamas were hiding in the Mosque or whether there was intelligence that there was something being planned or executed in there at that moment I don't know. Either way, it was wrong, of course - but the question has to come with a bit of context.
You talk about context but then fill your answer with supposition WTF?
Not supposition... why would the Israeli military have attacked the Mosque in your opinion? If they wanted to randomly kill civilians, then I'd argue they could have killed a lot more people... they were clearly trying to remove a non-civilian target
Am I right wing? Nope, far from it. I hate war, I hate fighting, I hate capitalism and I'm in fact a socialist at heart. But I've been to Israel many times, and from what i know, this is not about the powerful dictator keeping the poor people in their place. It's about protecting themselves from the terrorists that want to wipe them off the face of the planet. If this could be ended tomorrow and hamas (the terrorist cell) were wiped out,
Again this is not just about hamas is it. hamas is not in control of people in the west bank is it? Why can't the people in the west bank vote for those who control the land, ie ISRAEL? and if Israel is not in control of the west bank (it is) then why is it building settlements there? I wouldnreally like you to answer that one
Hamas IS in the west bank but...The settlements are indefensible... its an attempt to undermine the people living there. This is the non-violent approach, as opposed to what is happening in gaza. I get why this is viewed poorly, but to be frank, this has been going on for a long time, why do people only care now?
Do you think that the present Israel government is far right? If not, why not? I think that the Israeli government are clams, but they are necessary clams. If they weren't, Israel would be gone and I would be witnessing the beginning of another attempt to wipe Jews off the face of the planet - see the above link to the Pogroms or look at the manifestos of hamas or the other terrorist cells operating in the middle East
I just disagree with Derp I believe the people of Israel deserve a better government and better chance for peace.
I would love for there to be peace, but conceding land is sadly not the answer. People around the world should be rallying against hamas, and isis, and hezbollah, and Al qaeda - wipe them out and there can be peace in the middle East. Give up a tiny bit of land in Israel and the war will continue, just slightly nearer to the final solution...