With all due respect, 3-0 is hardly the scoreline of a team intent on parking the bus. And them having more shots than us also points to us being f***ing awful.
AVB knew Walker was injured, and that Rose wouldn't make it. He was forced to play Naughton at left-back and Walker at right-back despite his injury. Yet after knowing they wouldn't be effective wing-backs....he still uses a formation that relies heavily on wing-backs to provide width.
The result? A delighted Fat Sam put five players in the penalty box and choked off any play down the middle we could conjure up. He then hit us on the counter, knowing our centre-backs are slow on the turn and not very good at set-pieces, relying on his lads to drive at the heart of our defense and aggressively attack headers in the box. Against all these moves (based on very simple observations, by the way) what did AVB do? Well, the equivalent of twiddling his thumbs, sending Lamela on for Sigurdsson and then watching as West Ham hit us twice on the counter by using the same tactics they'd used all damn game: get it forward quickly, get it down and run at the Spurs back line.
Again, he failed to use Sandro to stem the tide of a game that was rapidly turning against us. And the way our players lost their nerve and became utterly spineless after their first goal went in was horrific to see, and surely something AVB could have prevented.
Overall, he was out-thought today. Big Sam honed his tactics to perfection against us while we flailed hopelessly against his own. And that has to be a black mark against AVB. Sort it out.
Bugger, just wrote quite a long response to this on my phone that somehow disappeared, so my reply now may not be as good.
What I wanted to say was that I still don't believe this was some Big Sam master class. He probably can't believe his luck that we were so bad. To throw it back over to you, I think the fact that they had more shots than us and won 3-0 shows more that this result was such a freak, no way did they play for that. They sat back, packed the middle and hit us on the break. In a sense they tried exactly what Norwich did here but in that game we overran Norwich. Because those kind of tactics are risky in themselves. You sit back, you allow our good players to play near your box and if we score you have spent the whole game not trying to score and now have to come at us, allowing us to pick you off. 90% of teams will play the way Big Sam did today, and 70-80% of the time we will break it down.
Today I don't think it was a problem that he picked Defoe - if he had scored everyone would have been crowing about what good man management it was to give Defoe the nod, such is the world of football where there are no absolutes and perfectly reasonable decisions will get lambasted if the result isn't gained. It wasn't even a problem with the defence, or the midfield, it was that the whole team just was not bang at it. They were complacent, they thought everything would fall into place for them eventually and everything had gone a little too well for this new squad since it had been assembled. So in a way, I'm glad this result has happened to allow us to iron out some kinks, and iron out the mentality. Because despite players saying otherwise, I think they had bought into the hype a little and it's got them today. It's happened early in the season so we can hopefully push on from now, rather than have it happen in Spring and have it kick start our annual collapse.
What I will say though is that I think we actually got results last year and played worse (and we were utterly terrible today, which shows you how bad we played last year). But I think the difference was last year AVB was managing for the result, and would make bigger adjustments to say the shape or defensive line to see us through. But this year I think he backs the system over the result in itself, and believes it we rely on the system consistency will follow.
I think Walker being injured lead to complacency spreading throughout the rest of the team. They saw he wasn't bang at it and I think it affected them too. Of course there was also the fact that he couldn't then provide the width as well as he does, leaving it all on Naughton (who I don't think he anywhere near as bad as people think). Maybe we could have changed the system, but to what? Townsend on the left? We've seen plenty of games where Bale and Lennon on their natural flanks have been easily marked out of matches, and having all our width through Townsend would have seen that near certainly happen IMO.
We showed flickers of what we could do in the first 50/60 minutes which follows the pattern of a lot of games, only when we've gone on to get the goal. This time it all went wrong. But I'm not worried. This was a nice wake up call and we are a still a quality side.