Never heard of him but looking at Brentford's recruitment he seems to be doing a great job.
Never heard of him but looking at Brentford's recruitment he seems to be doing a great job.
That's certainly a part of what he does. The hope would be that his methodology translates well to a club a couple of steps higher.Do they do anything though, or just implement Benham's algorithms?
Can he bring the algorithms with him?Do they do anything though, or just implement Benham's algorithms?
Can he bring the algorithms with him?
Not sure, but he wouldn't have wiped his own memory and forgotten everything he knows about it.Probably not - its intellectual property. Didn't Mitchell have to redo his 'black box' one when he moved from Soton to us?
Probably not - its intellectual property. Didn't Mitchell have to redo his 'black box' one when he moved from Soton to us?
It wasn't his algorithm. Tony bloom got it from students from lancaster university. Benham worked for bloom at premier bet.
I didnt think Unis in the UK were considered as publicallu funded? Dont Universities make pretty tight claims to research made under their umbrella, effectively owning all patents and research done by their students.It should be open access then if it was based on publicly funded research
It should be open access then if it was based on publicly funded research
Best of frenemieshttps://theathletic.com/3029279/202...on-tony-bloom-matthew-benham-brentford/?amp=1
Interesting article on the set ups. Seems set ups have been replicated across the board from Brighton to Brentford, including the companies they own, how they recruited and also owning second clubs to shake and bake signings
Sent from my SM-A127F using Fapatalk
I didnt think Unis in the UK were considered as publicallu funded? Dont Universities make pretty tight claims to research made under their umbrella, effectively owning all patents and research done by their students.
Certainly the case in the US
They are publicly funded, but not public sector (they are technically charities). It comes through two quangos (OfS and UKRI), but it's public money.
It all changed a decade or so ago with a big policy shift called 'open access'. Now all findings and a lot of raw data needs to be made freely available (no publisher paywalls or embargos) - it's conditions of the funding
If I recall correctly Mitchell’s ‘black box’ turned out not to be an algorithm at all and it was only so in your mind GB.Probably not - it’s intellectual property. Didn't Mitchell have to redo his 'black box' one when he moved from Soton to us?