Regarding the defensive nature and the counter attacking tactics.
I think there is a much greater chance of success if you play attacking players and get them doing defensive shifts - rather then overloading on defensive players, so that when you turn over possession you can really make teams pay.
One thing that I've noticed recently is that our ball retention on turnover is appalling. I believe part of the reason for this is we are often one body short moving forward.
The games where we've set out with only 3 attacking players, or 5 at the back are imo the biggest let downs - and I think they pan out as such for my reasons above.
As someone mentioned yesterday - there is no reason why we cant play a 433/4231 with the following
GK
RB
CB
CB
LB
PEH
Ndom
Son
Dele
Berg
Kane
Even though it looks attacking it could still be setup as a defensive system with Dele and Ndom supporting PEH without the ball and when we do turn possession over we have quality to keep the ball and hurt teams......and there is more than just 2 goal scorers in the team.
I think there is a much greater chance of success if you play attacking players and get them doing defensive shifts - rather then overloading on defensive players, so that when you turn over possession you can really make teams pay.
One thing that I've noticed recently is that our ball retention on turnover is appalling. I believe part of the reason for this is we are often one body short moving forward.
The games where we've set out with only 3 attacking players, or 5 at the back are imo the biggest let downs - and I think they pan out as such for my reasons above.
As someone mentioned yesterday - there is no reason why we cant play a 433/4231 with the following
GK
RB
CB
CB
LB
PEH
Ndom
Son
Dele
Berg
Kane
Even though it looks attacking it could still be setup as a defensive system with Dele and Ndom supporting PEH without the ball and when we do turn possession over we have quality to keep the ball and hurt teams......and there is more than just 2 goal scorers in the team.