Let’s take Kane at face value because the lad seems very honest to me.
Jose is the man on the sideline with some control over the situation. Whether or not he told the team to sit back, he’s watched them do it time and again and concede. His job, if the players aren’t or can’t follow his instructions, is to manage that situation so they try something new to stop us being pegged back.
Whether Jose told them to sit back or not is irrelevant. He saw it happen repeatedly (because we all called it at the time) and failed to do anything to stop it.
Mourinho has to take some responsibility for sure, but I do not buy that such an intelligent man sets his team up to park the bus once we go 1-0 up and to be honest our performances haven’t even shown that - in all the games except Wolves we have had plenty of opportunities to score a second and third.This...plus direct orders are not always necessary to effect complicity in an ideal. Often, by establishing a certain "fear" of NOT doing things a certain way, you can avoid having to actually say the words one after the other. I have absolutely no doubt that we are sometimes playing scared of making mistakes/cedeing possession in the act of actually trying to do something creative or special. We are now a side who are designed to not give up possession in certain areas of the pitch (which makes the fact we consistently seem to give up goals on balls swinging in from the left quite ironic). I think Kane is too smart to say much of anything other than taking responsibility, which I personally feel is perhaps shared at most...
Mourinho has to take some responsibility for sure, but I do not buy that such an intelligent man sets his team up to park the bus once we go 1-0 up and to be honest our performances haven’t even shown that - in all the games except Wolves we have had plenty of opportunities to score a second and third.
I also find it funny that it’s some of those who watched constant turgid displays usually far worse than this in our final year of Poch but defended him and claimed it wasnt his fault, he needs new players are now the ones claiming it’s all on the coach who has basically been using the same set of players save Hojberg and Reguilon. As always the truth lies somewhere inbetween, the players have been adapting to a more pragmatic approach but haven’t been totally getting it right about when to play it safe and when to attack - as highlighted in MOTD yesterday whenever our players received the ball we were instantly looking forward which led to more positive moves more frequently. I’m sure Mourinho has been drilling into them you can’t non-figuratively just sit back on a one goal lead in this day and age, and the players do have to step up and take some responsibility for this. But of course, as is always the way it is the coach that has to take ultimate responsibility....
Let’s take Kane at face value because the lad seems very honest to me.
Jose is the man on the sideline with some control over the situation. Whether or not he told the team to sit back, he’s watched them do it time and again and concede. His job, if the players aren’t or can’t follow his instructions, is to manage that situation so they try something new to stop us being pegged back.
Whether Jose told them to sit back or not is irrelevant. He saw it happen repeatedly (because we all called it at the time) and failed to do anything to stop it.
Not too shabby an improvement upon last season, despite our inability to see out games...
View attachment 10659
Poch gets a degree of leeway due to the season of no additions and the low numbers of incomings in the previous seasons. Of course that doesn't completely mitigate his responsibility, Poch was the one constantly selecting the gruesome midfield pairing of Sissoko and Winks along with a non performing Eriksen and a far from his best Dele. He did decide to change it up with the additions of GLC and Ndombele but it came too late and the slide had already happened.
Jose has very much had the opposite, he's had money to bring players in as well as the benefit of those last 2 quality players that joined in the latter days of Poch's regime. So understandably some might have less patience with him. My personal complaint has been he can do better with the players he has available to him, so the form and repetitive systemic issues the side have been demonstrating are down to him, just as the good form and some excellent performances this season have been as well.
Issue is who do you bring in, I would say Dier has been the stand out defender and even he has had the odd brainfart.
Same with the Midfield, GLC always being injured narrows the option down - hopefully the increase fitness sees Ndombele playing more 90 minutes.
Its great saying players are not following instructions, but we dont have other players to bring in.
We had Sissoko playing in a very advanced position against Fulham. A position he just isn't capable of playing. We had Moura, Bale and Dele on the bench.
Changes don't just have to be personnel changes either. I'd always have put great faith in Jose from his Chelsea and Madrid days of being able to change a game through subs or tactical changes. He seemed incapable of doing that against three mediocre teams in Wolves, Palace and Fulham. Poch, with some justification, got pelters on here for his attitude to subs but he did often make tactical changes in games that swung momentum in our favour. Jose should have been able to do likewise in those games.
That I agree on, I don't think his selections have been spot on - anytime Sissoko starts is wrong
I would like to see us using wingbacks from now on, I think given the players we have its our best formation
We still had the best chances against those teams except Wolves - if you can't take your chances, I am not sure that is on the manager.
Palace their keeper got MOTMSissoko can do a job if you put no offensive responsibility on his shoulders. I saw someone else say he's where attacks go to die and I'd agree with that.
We did have better chances for sure against Fulham but they all came first half aside from Sonny's off the post. My recollection of Palace is we didn't have much, particularly second half and against Wolves our last shot was in the 21st minute or something. But the common trend in all three games was that we got pinned back second half. And you could see it plainly before the inevitable equaliser came. Whether we had stacks of chances before that which we failed to convert doesn't matter. We were 1 up and under pressure with a habit of conceding in similar circumstances. That's when the manager has to take control and do something. And with Jose's knowledge of the game, track record and intelligence, it's why I'm stumped that he didn't.
Palace their keeper got MOTM
His key saves were after they score too
Hugo didn’t make a save really though so I guess it’s what you class as dominatingAh fair point. Recall that now. He pulled off a couple of great stops to be fair including a great save from a Dier free kick. However, they were undeniably dominating the game second half and it felt for a while that an equaliser was coming.
The goal was coming and came.Hugo didn’t make a save really though so I guess it’s what you class as dominating
I had a conversation with someone about this last night...the only point I was making was that in the after match interviews when asked 'did you tell them....' if you think it thru to its logical conclusion he must of been telling the truth (when saying 'no'). 1. Because otherwise he'd be deflecting the blame on the whole team if he did tell them to retreat 2. He prompted the interviewer to ask his players...hed be asking the players to come out and lie for him. Now I know he thinks he's lord of the manor but I don't think that would wash across the whole team, he'd be on his way to losing the dressing room.This...plus direct orders are not always necessary to effect complicity in an ideal. Often, by establishing a certain "fear" of NOT doing things a certain way, you can avoid having to actually say the words one after the other. I have absolutely no doubt that we are sometimes playing scared of making mistakes/cedeing possession in the act of actually trying to do something creative or special. We are now a side who are designed to not give up possession in certain areas of the pitch (which makes the fact we consistently seem to give up goals on balls swinging in from the left quite ironic). I think Kane is too smart to say much of anything other than taking responsibility, which I personally feel is perhaps shared at most...
Issue is who do you bring in, I would say Dier has been the stand out defender and even he has had the odd brainfart.
Same with the Midfield, GLC always being injured narrows the option down - hopefully the increase fitness sees Ndombele playing more 90 minutes.
Its great saying players are not following instructions, but we dont have other players to bring in.
Why was it coming ?The goal was coming and came.
Why was it coming ?
Conversely in those games were we making saves? And was the differentiatir the quality of our players over there’s?Territorial pressure and number of balls played in to dangerous goal scoring areas.
If you're just looking at saves made by the keeper then a lot of our low scoring wins this season were very fortunate indeed
Conversely in those games were we making saves? And was the differentiatir the quality of our players over there’s?
I assume you mean Burnley and a West Brom and Brighton?