• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

European Super League - Dead on arrival

What exactly is the problem with fan groups wanting some representation, so that they are a constituent that is at least considered when these big decisions happen in the future? Maybe having someone in the room saying 'STOP, THIS IS INSANE!' will mean we nip some of these things in the bud?

I haven't historically been the biggest fan of THST, I think they have acted in quite an entitled way at times and I think going straight in with 'we demand the board resign' hasn't helped their cause at all. But the general concept of fan representation is a perfectly fair one. We are fans, why would we not want this? We have just seen a quite hilarious and quite seismic tanking of a European Super League due to fan pressure, and if fans voices were better represented when these decisions get made, it may well have not gotten that far.

One question - what does fan representation bring to the table other than "I don't like that (whatever that is -> ticket price, ESL, squad investment)"

I'm not completely sold that the ESL tanked due to fan pressure, I'd believe that if it happened after a week or two, reality (only facts we know)
- City & Chelsea were the last to join (6 required due to majority vote needed in PL)
- Both immediately bailed within 24 hours effectively killing the others ability to stand against the PL rules

If you want a foil hat perspective, City & Chelsea don't benefit from ESL (same as Bayern in Germany) and potentially get disadvantaged by it, look at the above with that in mind.
 
What exactly is the problem with fan groups wanting some representation, so that they are a constituent that is at least considered when these big decisions happen in the future? Maybe having someone in the room saying 'STOP, THIS IS INSANE!' will mean we nip some of these things in the bud?

I haven't historically been the biggest fan of THST, I think they have acted in quite an entitled way at times and I think going straight in with 'we demand the board resign' hasn't helped their cause at all. But the general concept of fan representation is a perfectly fair one. We are fans, why would we not want this? We have just seen a quite hilarious and quite seismic tanking of a European Super League due to fan pressure, and if fans voices were better represented when these decisions get made, it may well have not gotten that far.

we call ourselves fans, we're customers, stupidly loyal customers admittedly, but that's the relationship, I have no more right to a say or expertise to impart to a football club than I do a car manufacturer or a soft drinks company
 
we call ourselves fans, we're customers, stupidly loyal customers admittedly, but that's the relationship, I have no more right to a say or expertise to impart to a football club than I do a car manufacturer or a soft drinks company

Thank you, people don't get being part of a board is a responsibility and part of that responsibility is in direct conflict with a fans view

- Tottenham's mission is to get the most money as possible out of supporters (customers) to enable the club to progress on the field.

What fan representation is going to agree with that? Even if they did, what other value will they bring, how is having a fan view help the business? (seems the best answer so far is to be able to shout "look out", club could pay a consultant for that)
 
PL tv rights have outgrown CL for years, the composition of CL/ESL to what people will pay to watch the PL is not related, red herring again

Your golden rule is how to be a victim, did West Ham help us when our players were fudging food poisoned with our big shot at CL (game had zero impact on them), no they still laugh at it, did anyone else in the league back us when Chelsea won CL and we were 4th? did anyone in league/FA help us with our stadium planning. If you want to be happy being irrelevant = that's the route.

Barca, Juve, Bayern, PSG and soon City have mostly dominated their domestic leagues for a decade, Madrid the CL. Guess what, the fans don't disappear, if you get bored their is global line of 8 billion people happy to take your spot.

The weird fact is ESL would have made the PL & La Liga more competitive, 9 clubs on even footing with a set wage structure

Instead we will watch City/Chelsea fudge us over with odd appearance by Pool/United as they outspend everyone, but somehow that is fairer.

Ok say it all went ahead and we were in it. The salary cap would be what exactly? 50% of turnover? So utd, real and barca get to spend more on players than us. Then they say, hold on we get much better viewing figures than you. We want more tv revenue. So spurs end up near the bottom of the league with not even a relegation battle to keep us interested.
Soon they realise, hold on. Asians struggle to watch us on midweek nights. We should move to saturdays as well. Pull out of your domestic leagues. Oh and chelsea you can't get planning permission why not move to moscow? 160 million russians huge market. And do we really need 2 clubs in manchester?

Nobody is saying the current situation is good. La liga and the bundesliga are making tv distribution more fair to make their leagues more competitive. We also need better finacial regulations in the game. But this wasn't the answer.
 
One question - what does fan representation bring to the table other than "I don't like that (whatever that is -> ticket price, ESL, squad investment)"

I'm not completely sold that the ESL tanked due to fan pressure, I'd believe that if it happened after a week or two, reality (only facts we know)
- City & Chelsea were the last to join (6 required due to majority vote needed in PL)
- Both immediately bailed within 24 hours effectively killing the others ability to stand against the PL rules

If you want a foil hat perspective, City & Chelsea don't benefit from ESL (same as Bayern in Germany) and potentially get disadvantaged by it, look at the above with that in mind.

It means that group of constituents is represented. I think there are many stakeholders in the game of football; board members, broadcast partners, leagues, national associations, players, fans, club staff, coaching staff, I could go on.

When big decisions get made about the future of our club, or any club, it's helpful to have the voice of the people that matter involved in shaping that decision so that things don't skew too far one way or the other. I think players are an interesting part of this too - imagine doing something that meant hypothetically there would be a game every other day all season? Maybe the projections come back saying we'd make a brick load of money from it. But if players weren't consulted, maybe it gets announced and the whole thing dies because they collectively refuse.

It seems you are saying fans for the most part aren't actually going to be a valuable voice in determining the future of the club, and the people that know best should be able to just get on with it without being slowed down. Which is fine, I kinda get it, but why as a fan would you not want the opportunity to have your voice represented and heard?

Why did City and Chelsea bail? Why bother signing up in the first place?
 
Thank you, people don't get being part of a board is a responsibility and part of that responsibility is in direct conflict with a fans view

- Tottenham's mission is to get the most money as possible out of supporters (customers) to enable the club to progress on the field.

What fan representation is going to agree with that? Even if they did, what other value will they bring, how is having a fan view help the business? (seems the best answer so far is to be able to shout "look out", club could pay a consultant for that)

I can't see how this is anything more than a box ticking exercise, surely the fan on the board will be expected to pass back information, it's not in the clubs business interest to allow any useful information out as it might be used by a competitor.

My hope is that its a smart move from Levy, will get the goodwill of some fans, will use the opportunity for what it is, but also give the trust a bloody nose at the same time.
 
I have no more right to a say or expertise to impart to a football club than I do a car manufacturer or a soft drinks company
But no car manufacturer would launch a new design without consulting customers by means of market research. Had fans been engaged / consulted, the proposals might have been more nuanced, more acceptable, and not the forthcoming MBA case study on "how not to launch a new product"...........
 
we call ourselves fans, we're customers, stupidly loyal customers admittedly, but that's the relationship, I have no more right to a say or expertise to impart to a football club than I do a car manufacturer or a soft drinks company

Come oooooon man! What is this self deprecating talk I am seeing here? How happy are you going to be if Spurs decide they don't need to cater to their home country fans, because there's loads of people in Asia and the US that will want to watch them? When kick off times start happening at strange times, or they start taking the club on tour during the proper season? Or Game 39 happens? At what point does the club's ability to make more money and progress come in to conflict with your desire and interest to watch them?
 
It seems you are saying fans for the most part aren't actually going to be a valuable voice in determining the future of the club, and the people that know best should be able to just get on with it without being slowed down. Which is fine, I kinda get it, but why as a fan would you not want the opportunity to have your voice represented and heard?

We're not.

I don't want my voice heard on running a football club, I have no idea how to run a football club, any idea I had would be ill informed and likely unworkable. Get me in the Liverpool or arsenal board room absolutely, I'm all for that.
 
we call ourselves fans, we're customers, stupidly loyal customers admittedly, but that's the relationship, I have no more right to a say or expertise to impart to a football club than I do a car manufacturer or a soft drinks company
I met someone from the club a few years ago and rest assured, he informed me they call us ‘customers’ too!
 
I have no more right to a say or expertise to impart to a football club than I do a car manufacturer or a soft drinks company
But no car manufacturer would launch a new design without consulting customers by means of market research. Had fans been engaged / consulted, the proposals might have been more nuanced, more acceptable, and not the forthcoming MBA case study on "how not to launch a new product"...........

they do it all the time, market research and customers are two different things, as Steve Jobs said, "customers don't know what they want until you show them", similarly, Henry Ford, "if I gave the customers what they wanted it would be a cart with more horses"*

*paraphrased
 
Thank you, people don't get being part of a board is a responsibility and part of that responsibility is in direct conflict with a fans view

- Tottenham's mission is to get the most money as possible out of supporters (customers) to enable the club to progress on the field.

What fan representation is going to agree with that? Even if they did, what other value will they bring, how is having a fan view help the business? (seems the best answer so far is to be able to shout "look out", club could pay a consultant for that)

Same question to you - at what point does the club's insatiable capitalist desire for more money and 'progress' which takes them further into Asia, Africa and the US come into conflict with your opinions as a fan to the point where you stop following the club? Will you be happy with the progress and be comfortable sending the club on it's merry way, even though the game you love is unrecognisable from when you started watching them? At one point do you just say 'no, this sucks?'. Or does that point never happen, because you think the club is making more money, and that's all that matters?

We absolutely have a right, and a say, and it is a fight. We can fight for it to still be the game we love as much as possible, or we can let it go. When we're all dead, the club can do what it wants, but why when we are in the prime of our lives would we just say it's fine, go ahead and make more money, even though I will probably be less interested in it?
 
Trust vastly overstepped their role and now will likely be quite irrelevant if you are correct.

Yes.

Here is the key: "The selection criteria, mandate and constitution will be developed by independent advisors in consultation with fan groups to ensure it is truly representative of our supporter base"

That's a plural indicating that, at best, THST will only be one of the parties consulted.
 
We're not.

I don't want my voice heard on running a football club, I have no idea how to run a football club, any idea I had would be ill informed and likely unworkable. Get me in the Liverpool or arsenal board room absolutely, I'm all for that.

You're not supposed to run the whole thing, you're supposed to, in this example, offer a fan's perspective. And then you would have a debate with people offering the broadcast perspective, the player's perspective, the bank's perspective etc etc.

All I'm saying is, why would you be so willing to give up your rights as a fan and at what point does that stop? At what point does progress and money come into conflict with the game you fell in love with? Because unchecked, it will happen. Global touring during regular season, Game 39, closed shop Super Leagues.
 
Come oooooon man! What is this self deprecating talk I am seeing here? How happy are you going to be if Spurs decide they don't need to cater to their home country fans, because there's loads of people in Asia and the US that will want to watch them? When kick off times start happening at strange times, or they start taking the club on tour during the proper season? Or Game 39 happens? At what point does the club's ability to make more money and progress come in to conflict with your desire and interest to watch them?

from which point of view?

those in charge of a business trying to be successful or one person
 
You're not supposed to run the whole thing, you're supposed to, in this example, offer a fan's perspective. And then you would have a debate with people offering the broadcast perspective, the player's perspective, the bank's perspective etc etc.

All I'm saying is, why would you be so willing to give up your rights as a fan and at what point does that stop? At what point does progress and money come into conflict with the game you fell in love with? Because unchecked, it will happen. Global touring during regular season, Game 39, closed shop Super Leagues.

I don't think I am giving up any rights, I don't think I ever had any.

All those things are likely to make us more money, which gives us more chance of success, so I'm all for them.
 
from which point of view?

those in charge of a business trying to be successful or one person

You, as a fan, who will be part of a group of 100s of 1000s of Spurs fans across the country. At what point does 'the business being successful' come into conflict with what you want to see as a fan? At what point will you be less interested in the club as a result? And at what point will you wish that you fought for what you first fell in love with about this game, because you see it's moved too far away from it?
 
Back