• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Eric Dier

Lilbaz said:
Because he's out of contract next summer. You are basically letting him go on a free a year before his contract ends.
Click to expand...

Burnley may not have been offering to pay his wages or a fee - just because we rejected an approach doesn't mean the reasons are what you want them to be.

Letting a player go on a free before his contract ends sounds a win in some cases, why would we be against that vs paying their wages for a year while they don't even make the match day squad ?
 
billyiddo said:
Burnley may not have been offering to pay his wages or a fee - just because we rejected an approach doesn't mean the reasons are what you want them to be.

Letting a player go on a free before his contract ends sounds a win in some cases, why would we be against that vs paying their wages for a year while they don't even make the match day squad ?
Click to expand...

See my previous posts. I've already gone over the reasons and how it could cost tens if not hundreds of millions of pounds in future transfer revenue. We need to do what we can to stop players running down their contracts.
 
Lilbaz said:
See my previous posts. I've already gone over the reasons and how it could cost tens if not hundreds of millions of pounds in future transfer revenue. We need to do what we can to stop players running down their contracts.
Click to expand...

I've seen your posts and i disagree with your thinking - if players are happy to see out their contracts they will do so and I'm not seeing collecting your wage whilst being 4th/5th choice as a deterrent.
 
billyiddo said:
I've seen your posts and i disagree with your thinking - if players are happy to see out their contracts they will do so and I'm not seeing collecting your wage whilst being 4th/5th choice as a deterrent.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. If we don't loan him though we still have the opportunity to try and sell in jan though. Get something back for him.
 
billyiddo said:
I've seen your posts and i disagree with your thinking - if players are happy to see out their contracts they will do so and I'm not seeing collecting your wage whilst being 4th/5th choice as a deterrent.
Click to expand...
If Sanchez and Tanganga go, Dier might think there's a possibility, just via lack of numbers that come a time of injuries and suspensions he'll ascend the option list.

Of course Ange might think there's more progress in advancing Philips or Dorrington in a crisis.
 
Lilbaz said:
As i said it sends out a terrible message to the other players. That if they sit tight they can run their contracts down with no repercussions. We would lose out on tens (if not hundreds) of millions of pounds of future transfer revenue.
Click to expand...
We're not losing out on any transfer revenue as these are players that we are paying highly, we don't want and nobody else particularly wants.
 
Lilbaz said:
Fair enough. If we don't loan him though we still have the opportunity to try and sell in jan though. Get something back for him.
Click to expand...
We could still do that with him on loan if we insert a recall clause. I also can't see us selling Dier in January. At that point he will be able to sign a pre-contract with an overseas club. We have to accept that we're not getting a penny for Dier and getting as much of his £80k a week off the books is the best outcome for us at present.
 
Finney Is Back said:
We're not losing out on any transfer revenue as these are players that we are paying highly, we don't want and nobody else particularly wants.
Click to expand...

There were rumours that he wanted to sit tight and only accept a loan. In order to leave on a free. That's why i think we can't allow that. All fringe players will start doing it. Hoping they either get a loan or tear their contracts up.
 
what windows are still open after today?

We could still move him on (even on loan) after today, just lest options.
And im sure, him sitting out for a season wont give him better options next summer
 
Lilbaz said:
Because he's out of contract next summer. You are basically letting him go on a free a year before his contract ends.
Click to expand...
You're also getting his wages off your wage bill a year early. We aren't getting a transfer fee so the only way to not make a net loss is to plan him out and have someone else pay his wages.

Sent from my XQ-BC72 using Fapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back