Leeds Spur
Banned
Knew the ****s would be out in force. We play 442 we get murdered. And Defoe in a situation where we need to hold play up after being on the rack is just the wrong decision. At the game everyone agreed it was the right decision.
Thats precisely it. I dont get why people want to have that extra midfielder 'to give us a chance' when in reality its serving us no benefit whatsoever. We are getting hammered by teams maybe not in terms of results but in terms of performances, we are not creating enough and conceding a number of goals. Nothing about the existing tactics, formation or application seems right and more pertinently seems natural or suitable to our current players.
A number of these players look like theyre playing to a rigid game plan when in reality they need the shackles loosened. I may well be overreacting here but it doesnt seem right.
By having that extra striker or forward (Dempsey no Sig no) then it would give the opposition something to think about giving Ade more space to work his magic and spreading play a bit to the likes of Bale and Lennon which means the opposition would have more defending to do and less attacking.
Its a small change admittedly but in the grand scheme of things the knock on effect by making that small change is massive to the 'dimensions' (no pun) of the team
No, I do not think he is an idiot but I do think he is prone to occasionally making the wrong decision. He so on occasion when he was at Chelsea. I also think he made a mistake taking off Defoe instead of Dempsey Wigan. I also think he is making a mistake Gallas captain and starting with him in the league every week.
On the whole I am well behind AVB but that will not stop me from pointing out things I think he has got wrong.Sure, but we're not talking about making the wrong decision where it's a close decision between one option and another. The claim was that Dempsey offered "nothing offensively and nothing defensively". Surely if that was the case AVB would have picked up on it?
got to disagree, it was the perfect game to go in with Defoe and Ade behind him. Ade tends to drift around anyway so it really is no big deal. City are not playing well and a team that dared go toe to toe with them might have profited. We will never know now and that is uber frustrating
Yeah. We got completely outplayed in that first half today.... City were just creating chance after chance...
</sarcasm>
He made several solid runs tracking back, there is a big difference between that and consistently getting back right side of the ball and doing a job the other players and the manager can trust defensively. I have never seen Ade do the kind of defensive job you want from the attacking midfielder/deeper forward in a game like this.
We saw Ade alongside Saha last season away to Arsenal and we got overrun.
Knew the ****s would be out in force. We play 442 we get murdered. And Defoe in a situation where we need to hold play up after being on the rack is just the wrong decision. At the game everyone agreed it was the right decision.
I get the sarcasm but whats funny is the attempt at sarcasm was quite poor. Just because they didnt create doesnt mean they didnt dominate. and wow dude - are we really going to judge our performances based constantly on what the opposition do rather than WHAT WE DO? We need to start thinking about what we do from now on - play to our strengths and fudge the opposition because at present us worrying too much about the opposition is not workin for us.
Jesus. That seems to be AVBs school of thought. As long as we restrict the opposition it doesnt matter what we do.
We seem to have forgotten about ourselves and have worried too much about the opposition. Im actually frustrated by that. Its kinda infuriating. Im not saying we forget who we are playing but if it dominates the mind then the players are just going to go out thinking about 'lets not concede' rather than 'lets score and win it'
Im not really talking just about todays game
I get the sarcasm but whats funny is the attempt at sarcasm was quite poor. Just because they didnt create doesnt mean they didnt dominate. and wow dude - are we really going to judge our performances based constantly on what the opposition do rather than WHAT WE DO? We need to start thinking about what we do from now on - play to our strengths and fudge the opposition because at present us worrying too much about the opposition is not workin for us.
Jesus. That seems to be AVBs school of thought. As long as we restrict the opposition it doesnt matter what we do.
We seem to have forgotten about ourselves and have worried too much about the opposition. Im actually frustrated by that. Its kinda infuriating. Im not saying we forget who we are playing but if it dominates the mind then the players are just going to go out thinking about 'lets not concede' rather than 'lets score and win it'
Knew the ****s would be out in force. We play 442 we get murdered. And Defoe in a situation where we need to hold play up after being on the rack is just the wrong decision. At the game everyone agreed it was the right decision.
No, I do not think he is an idiot but I do think he is prone to occasionally making the wrong decision. He so on occasion when he was at Chelsea. I also think he made a mistake taking off Defoe instead of Dempsey Wigan. I also think he is making a mistake Gallas captain and starting with him in the league every week.
On the whole I am well behind AVB but that will not stop me from pointing out things I think he has got wrong.
This is the same Harry that against Villa when we needed a win to guarantee 3rd place second to last game of the season took of VDV and brought on Parker ahead of Defoe. Sorry mate, I do not care what Harry said last season after that horrendous management decision.
When away from home against one of the best teams in the league and the reigning champions with some key players out injured and not in the best form ourselves I think going for a solid first approach where keeping the opponent at bay is a good idea.
are we never going to hear the end of this.....always, this game is brought up as a reason why we shouldnt go with 2 up front and its getting annoying now
can you give me another 10, ok il give you a chance another 5, examples where away from home we were overrun by playing Ade alongside another striker?
il tell you why we were overrun against Arse, its because we were unable to pass the ball from a to b, our passing and ball retention was shocking and all this despite having Modric (so lets not use Dembele's absence today a reason why our passing was shocking) Arse upped the pace and we fell apart.
what Redknapp failed to address was our passing when under pressure. Yes when teams let us play and gave us space we looked good, but any kind of concerted pressure and we simply fell apart
well, under AVB i see no change in this whatsoever.
City haven't lost at home in the league for nearly 3 years. Go toe to toe?
Clueless
When away from home against one of the best teams in the league and the reigning champions with some key players out injured and not in the best form ourselves I think going for a solid first approach where keeping the opponent at bay is a good idea.
if the players go into games with this attitude then we are in trouble in the long term. You are already setting yourself up for failure.
fcuk off...living up norf has turned you soft
A load of Ajax kids managed to get a CL point up there....we walked away with nada. Gutless
Well, people say that we could play Ade and Defoe together in a 4-4-2 away from home against a top team without getting overrun in midfield. How about some evidence for that?
if the players go into games with this attitude then we are in trouble in the long term. You are already setting yourself up for failure.
Playing Defoe and Ade would not have guaranteed a win but if we had lost and we had given it a go I would have felt much better this evening.