• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Welcome Ange: To Dare is to Didgeridoo

IMO a change is the worst thing we could do
Changing the manager doesn’t change the players
These payers are better than what we are seeing, they don't buy in it seems or have the ability to do what is asked of them, I'm not sure many players in the world can

Pep/Klopp/Arteta have been the most successful managers in the league recently, they all have a solid core, we just don't like interested in doing this.
 
I don't like how he stands with his hands in his pockets when we're playing absolutely sh|te
To be fair to him, he made the changes today that he was criticised for not doing against Brighton. And he arguably proved his point or at least provided evidence to support it.

We were so far off it as a team, in terms of desire and application, that a big change in personnel and formation made no difference.

Unfortunately for Ange, responsibility for that sits at his door.
 
These payers are better than what we are seeing, they don't buy in it seems or have the ability to do what is asked of them, I'm not sure many players in the world can

Pep/Klopp/Arteta have been the most successful managers in the league recently, they all have a solid core, we just don't like interested in doing this.
And how long did it take them to get that solid core? It's still early days.
 
To be fair to him, he made the changes today that he was criticised for not doing against Brighton. And he arguably proved his point or at least provided evidence to support it.

We were so far off it as a team, in terms of desire and application, that a big change in personnel and formation made no difference.

Unfortunately for Ange, responsibility for that sits at his door.
It sits with him but the accountability has to be taken by the players
Another meek and tepid bottle job
 
These players struggle to defend and we were deep today
That’s not that the answer at all

bring the wingers back and there isn't always a man over for the opposition out wide

sit the MF deeper and there are more bodies in there for second balls

play long once in a while and the opposition can't sit on the half way line knowing we are going to faff around in our box
 
bring the wingers back and there isn't always a man over for the opposition out wide

sit the MF deeper and there are more bodies in there for second balls

play long once in a while and the opposition can't sit on the half way line knowing we are going to faff around in our box
I agree with the last part
The rest isn’t the answer at all imo
We should not be playing to defend
We should defend as part of the attacking system
But when your defenders fall over loads (VDV today) or can’t pass (Udogie again) and then you have physically weaker players like Porro you have issues
If we played 4 centre backs like Arsenal I’d agree. But we don’t have 4 in the squad
 
And how long did it take them to get that solid core? It's still early days.
I'm all for discussing Anges mistakes etc but finding the little clamour of sack Ange comments after every defeat way OTT. There is no magic bullet out there and we aren't backed by an oil state so no matter who the manager is there is going to be periods of pain and it's going to take time.

Sacking him would just mean we have to reset, wait another two years for someone philosophy to be properly embedded, whilst getting in his players only to then discover we probably still aren't good enough to challenge for titles and start the merry go round again. Or alternatively we could get in a Conte type again, that would be more fun :D....
 
I agree with the last part
The rest isn’t the answer at all imo
We should not be playing to defend
We should defend as part of the attacking system
But when your defenders fall over loads (VDV today) or can’t pass (Udogie again) and then you have physically weaker players like Porro you have issues
If we played 4 centre backs like Arsenal I’d agree. But we don’t have 4 in the squad

no, you attack from your defensive system

first and foremost you have to stop the opposition playing, you take opportunities away from them, you put them in positions where they make the mistakes

we do the opposite
 
I'm all for discussing Anges mistakes etc but finding the little clamour of sack Ange comments after every defeat way OTT. There is no magic bullet out there and we aren't backed by an oil state so no matter who the manager is there is going to be periods of pain and it's going to take time.

Sacking him would just mean we have to reset, wait another two years for someone philosophy to be properly embedded, whilst getting in his players only to then discover we probably still aren't good enough to challenge for titles and start the merry go round again. Or alternatively we could get in a Conte type again, that would be more fun :D....
I'm not convinced he will be the answer but I'm willing to give him time and the chance to prove me wrong. If we wet the bed every time a manager goes through a couple of bad games and sack them we will never find a manager who is the answer.
 
I'm not convinced he will be the answer but I'm willing to give him time and the chance to prove me wrong. If we wet the bed every time a manager goes through a couple of bad games and sack them we will never find a manager who is the answer.
We would never have a manager
I mean this isn’t new
The way we folded today is sexy in a nutshell
Issue is fans are reactionary to every result by default
We win midweek and against Villa (which I think we will ) and suddenly it’s a different outlook
 
Back