Finney Is Back
Luka Modric
So you think that Lacazette or Lukaku would start ahead of Kane?There was no mention of prices in GB's post - read back above. All he said was 'Players signed by EPL clubs this summer who would improve us:'
So you think that Lacazette or Lukaku would start ahead of Kane?There was no mention of prices in GB's post - read back above. All he said was 'Players signed by EPL clubs this summer who would improve us:'
I would have bought Lukaku and just started him in the League cup and FA cup games. Harry for the PL and CL with Lukaku on the bench.
Bale or ?? on the move?
James and Morata have already left.
Monaco have been ripped apart this window. With Silva, Mendy, Mbappe and Bakayoko gone/going, Lemar is now really their only top player left
It really makes you appreciate Levy and Poch, as we could easily be in a similar position, yet have only lost Walker so far.
It shows the difference in approach too - we get labelled a selling club and told that our strategy of buying low is purely so we can sell high at a later date, that is of course a benefit of the approach but not its sole focus, whereas Monaco and Porto buy these types of players with the intention of selling them and happily do so once they reach their peak value
We saw this with Sissoko expecting to start games, even though he was doing nothing to warrant it.I dont think we need any 'established quality' at all. I actually think that sort of player might even be detrimental to our squad.
I think the sort of young, still slightly rough diamonds that we seem to be interested in (Barkley, Toljan, Pereira, Seri, Kovacic, etc) are exactly the right type of players for us. They have shown something already, but are still young enough to improve and hungry enough to WANT to improve.
Any player that comes to Spurs has to accept Pochettino's ethos of coming here to train. It is quite likely that any new player coming in will not be a first team starter, especially not initially, 'established quality' is far less likely to accept that and that can start to lead to cliques and poor harmony in the dressing room.
That would last all 5 months (till Lukaku would agitate his way out at a 100% reduction in value in the following window)
I dont think we need any 'established quality' at all. I actually think that sort of player might even be detrimental to our squad.
I think the sort of young, still slightly rough diamonds that we seem to be interested in (Barkley, Toljan, Pereira, Seri, Kovacic, etc) are exactly the right type of players for us. They have shown something already, but are still young enough to improve and hungry enough to WANT to improve.
Any player that comes to Spurs has to accept Pochettino's ethos of coming here to train. It is quite likely that any new player coming in will not be a first team starter, especially not initially, 'established quality' is far less likely to accept that and that can start to lead to cliques and poor harmony in the dressing room.
What - you mean like we are going to be able to do with Sissoko?The way transfer fees are going we could have sold him for twice what we paid
So you think Lukaku would come to Spurs and be happy to sit on the bench for the big games? Additionally you think that we should buy a back-up player and pay him wages twice as big as our highest earning first choice player? What impact do you think that will have to squad harmony and also contract negotiations for every single existing player at the club?I would have bought Lukaku and just started him in the League cup and FA cup games. Harry for the PL and CL with Lukaku on the bench.
So you think that Lacazette or Lukaku would start ahead of Kane?
There was no mention of starting. It simply said 'improve us'
I was quoting the fees for Salah and Lacazette that had been mentioned as possible improvements to our squad, I don't think either would be automatic starters if all are fit.There was no mention of prices in GB's post - read back above. All he said was 'Players signed by EPL clubs this summer who would improve us:'