looking back, we looked so much faster across the pitch, especially in attack. i mean chadli, kane both looked superfast ... i know speed is relative but what gives ? chelsea aren't a slow team. or was it an older team fatigued through fixture congestion versus a younger team with fresher legs through better rotation ?
I don't think Kane is that fast,but Chadli is quick. It seems many here don't think so, don't know why - maybe it's because he's physically bigger than your traditional winger and so his pace is more deceptive, but he is quick....
Sitting on my porcelain throne using Fapatalk