Hotshot-Tottenham
Edgar Davids
I missed that stamp live too, and you're right, it's terrible.
Would the club usually report this, or does the ref assessor bring it up? The FA?
He should certainly be charged, the coward.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
*** Tottenham Hotspur vs Chelsea *** OMT
- Thread starter Papercut
- Start date
I missed that stamp live too, and you're right, it's terrible.
Would the club usually report this, or does the ref assessor bring it up? The FA?
He should certainly be charged, the coward.
Denmark Spur
Michael Carrick
LutonSpurs
Eric Dear
What the serious Eff is that about. Sterling and now Cahill. It would seem the FA likes to protect its international players. Otherwise this makes no sense. Mofos
K.D.D.D.D.Soc
Ian Walker
Nothing will happen. The club haven't made a fuss, unlike many we could all name, the FA can now do their famed impression of the 3 monkeys.
braineclipse
Steve Sedgley
Probably.
Their "did the ref see it or not" ridiculousness for handing out retrospective punishment then allows them to do whatever they prefer in each situation.
LutonSpurs
Eric Dear
Apparently the ref didn't see it and will still not get punished. Anyway this is sky sources so hopefully it is wrong. If not, the club should take this up. It's ridiculous. We need to make sure our players are as protected as anybody elses.
braineclipse
Steve Sedgley
Agreed!
A couple of media outlets picking up on it. But MOTD and the other major outlets apparently haven't reported it so very little actual pressure on the FA to do something.
glasgowspur
Andy Thompson
I'd love to see where I said lucky?
The fact is Kane had one option and no support. He took that option and scored, there's good fortune in that but what if the shot had been blocked, saved or missed?
We as supporters, myself included, have bemoaned teams scoring long range wonder goals against us the last couple of weeks, well it was our time this week and it's over due but we should be concerned that Kane had no other option.
Sitting on my porcelain throne using Fapatalk
Its a brilliant individual goal, took on 5 players from a wide/no threat position and made it happen, no luck, also is you look at the play, we had two runners that helped prevent the Cheat$ki defense from closing him down completely.
All our goals yesterday, had people running elsewhere, options available (Chadli's goal, Paulinho was an open option, Rose's goal was a run to support Chadli).
Fact is our front line (Eriksen/Chadli/Kane) made the positioning of a very good back line with covering DM look all over the place.
glasgowspur
Andy Thompson
In sorry but I have to disagree about the first goal, chadli (who I thought had a great game is and is generally underrated) and Townsend were half hearted at best. The point I'm trying to make, and obv not very well, is that a lot could have went wrong or differently between Kane picking up the ball and scoring, we were formate it didn't and he had little or no options. I'm NOT saying it was a lucky strike, Kane was lucky or it was a generally goal. A lot had to happen just as it did for that goal, if Kane had miss controlled, over ran it or had a tackle changed the direction of the ball there was NO ONE on hand to gather the ball and carry on or help Kane out.
Sitting on my porcelain throne using Fapatalk
Sitting on my porcelain throne using Fapatalk
superfaisty
Nico Claesen
Anyone know if i can get some longer highlights than the motd ones or even the full match?
glorygloryeze
Tom Huddlestone
glasgowspur
Andy Thompson
Yes fortunate-not lucky. Lucky has a negative connotation . A lucky break, lucky *******s etc. fortunate is more akin to things working out for you. Semantics? Maybe, but a definate difference IMV
Sitting on my porcelain throne using Fapatalk
Sitting on my porcelain throne using Fapatalk
glorygloryeze
Tom Huddlestone
Ok then :lol:
braineclipse
Steve Sedgley
I definitely get your point.
It was a magnificent individual effort from quite far out after getting past a couple of players. Scored at a time in the match where we weren't exactly opening up Chelsea for fun.
Sometimes you need special players to produce something special against good teams to get the result. They had that from Hazard for the opener, they definitely had that when we lost a the Bridge.
In a way it makes Kane's goal even better. They knew about him, they knew he was our main threat. And still they couldn't stop him.
SteveAWOL
Barry Daines
Re: *** Tottenham Hotspur vs Chel53a *** OMT
Bit like how Terry got away with racially abusing Ledley King back in 2006 and the FA swept the incident under the carpet because he was the England captain at the time.
Then the one time the FA decide to punish Terry for being a racist scumbag they end up screwing Spurs over again as it sets in motion the events which lead to Capello' resignation and then Redknapp thinking he was destined to take the job...
Bit like how Terry got away with racially abusing Ledley King back in 2006 and the FA swept the incident under the carpet because he was the England captain at the time.
Then the one time the FA decide to punish Terry for being a racist scumbag they end up screwing Spurs over again as it sets in motion the events which lead to Capello' resignation and then Redknapp thinking he was destined to take the job...