Mosquito_Coasting
Gerry Armstrong
I reckon Porro could have done a better job than Skipp in that position today. Seems like he could play in field some.
He's been poor for a while now, used to be really direct and run at people. Seems to have lost confidence.
.Decent. All a bit narrow and Kulu really looked lost in the second half -- not sure why Solomon didn't come on for him.
The first 25 minutes of the second half we were absolutely dominant and you could see one of Ange's big points. Keep the ball, keep it moving and the opposition will tire. Shame we didn't have more up front. Think we'll be after a clinical striker before the window closes.
Thought Micky did well having only been at the club for a few days! Vicario overall solid, 2 dodgy moments: the parry, which fell to Damsgaard for a weak attempt and charging off his line towards the end. But I think he'll suit the system well.
I'm not sure if that's the issue for Kulu, more so that people know his game now - he almost always cuts inside and is very left footed, doesn't have blistering pace so now defenders can read him it's more difficult.He's been poor for a while now, used to be really direct and run at people. Seems to have lost confidence.
Front three probably the worse performing players on the pitch - best players have all been mentioned but i think Sanchez deserves a nod as he was solid
Kulusevski looks a bit predictable. When he first came you never knew what came next, shot, pass, carry inside or outside. Now he usually runs to the byline and squares it out. Maybe he's been found out, or as you say, has a confidence issue.He's been poor for a while now, used to be really direct and run at people. Seems to have lost confidence.
Front three probably the worse performing players on the pitch - best players have all been mentioned but i think Sanchez deserves a nod as he was solid
Agreed - excellent from him, and interesting to see him ahead of Dier and Davies. Can’t see him wanting to stay though as 3rd/4th choice.
Richarlison has work rate, is decent techically and obviously has heart. He will score a few, perhaps even a couple of good ones. But as it stands he's very, very upgradable.
Kulusevski looks a bit predictable. When he first came you never knew what came next, shot, pass, carry inside or outside. Now he usually runs to the byline and squares it out. Maybe he's been found out, or as you say, has a confidence issue.
Today that's not exactly a badge of honour, though it has to be said that Son wasn't that poor. But he has really lost pace and explosiveness, does the same flicks and doesn't shoot from the edge of the box as much. Without that, he's a bit ordinary to be honest.Don't think Kulu was awful. He is creative and was looking to progress the ball. Better than Son.
There wasn’t one playerKulu can't play when there's a player sticking to him. Very easy to get marked out. Should have been subbed imo.