***TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR vs Brentford OMT***

[Robspur12]

Not sure why there is any argument at all. Nonetheless it's a setback we will overcome. 2-1 to us.

Fudge it.

 

[billyiddo]

Ffs

 

[SubZero]

This is getting ridiculous

 

[Spoonman]

Never a booking for Sanchez. 1st game, 1st brick ref.

 

[Grays_1890]

Zero concentration there

 

[monkeybarry]

How is him falling over not the consequence of the contact?
Don’t get me wrong, he milked it, and held the wrong ankle which shows he dived
But he was on the deck… that’s the consequence

You've answered your own question.
The contract clearly didn't cause him to fall over or to impede his play.

 

[billyiddo]

Goalkeeper looks good

 

[Chrissivad]

fudge sake

 

[SpurMeUp]

yeah it would, if you turn and a defender takes a leg out from under you, its a foul, wherever it is on the pitch

Yes if that was the case. But his leg wasn't taken out from under him. It was brushed. On video replay, they are looking for contact rather than a foul, which is the issue. @bedford said it himself, the same techincal 'foul' outside the box wasn't a foul.

 

[Yiddo]

FFS! Not even a freekick in the first fudging place.

 

[P.D.]

That's really poor defending. Shouldn't be unmarked.

 

[nelto]

Royal was absolutely brick there

 

[Hotshot-Tottenham]

Yes into Norgaard's ankle. In real time doesn't look like much but there's enough contact there for the player to go down.

No there wasn’t. He put his foot down then jumped to the ground. The contact didn’t trip him.

 

[billyiddo]

Can't blame the attacking play for that one

 

[Yiddo]

Love how we are being made an example of for these new fudging rules.

 

[fernadez]

Looks like the fix is in

 

[Robspur12]

Midfield completely missing there, Brentford scorer had too much time.

 

[Grays_1890]

Goalkeeper looks good

TBF he had that covered, not too sure he can account for defenders deflection

 

[Baleforce]

Yes if that was the case. But his leg wasn't taken out from under him. It was brushed. On video replay, they are looking for contact rather than a foul, which is the issue. @bedford said it himself, the same techincal 'foul' outside the box wasn't a foul.

the first contact was the foul, all day, every day

 

[Gilzeantoscore]

The ref is a homer that''s for sure. He's allowing the crowd to award the cards and free kicks.

 

[Spoonman]

Easy save until the deflection.