• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

***TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR vs Brentford OMT***

monkeybarry said:
Because the rule is contact with consequence.
That contact did not create that consequence. It didn't significantly impede his play.
He might have got a bruise, so if it's contact with consequence, we should send him to Boots to buy some plasters
Click to expand...
How is him falling over not the consequence of the contact?
Don’t get me wrong, he milked it, and held the wrong ankle which shows he dived
But he was on the deck… that’s the consequence
 
SpurMeUp said:
Because it wouldn't be a foul in normal play outside the box as there wasn't enough contact to bring down a player. Therefore, very soft.
Click to expand...

yeah it would, if you turn and a defender takes a leg out from under you, its a foul, wherever it is on the pitch
 
Issue with Richarlison is that he doesn't do anything in open play. No link up, no dropping off. It's like playing with a man less.
 
Bedfordspurs said:
How is him falling over not the consequence of the contact?
Don’t get me wrong, he milked it, and held the wrong ankle which shows he dived
But he was on the deck… that’s the consequence
Click to expand...
Not sure why there is any argument at all. Nonetheless it's a setback we will overcome. 2-1 to us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back