• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

*** Tottenham Hotspur v Nottingham Forest ***

Raziel said:
@SpurMeUp is correct, I was there, the crowd went toxic on Nuno, was booing his subs, usual "you don't know what you are doing"



Let me fix that -> it was reported that we went for 20 other managers

Again, I even remember this board, no one saw the logic at the time of hiring a non-toxic manager who had manager to get Wolves to European positions, to get Spurs 1 or 2 spots higher ..
Click to expand...
I was happy about his appointment, at the time thought he had done well at Wolves. Again it's up to the Board to support their man, if they really believed in him. They didn't really want him so got rid. His position would not be untenable a dozen games into the season.
 
Nexus1967 said:
Tottenham shoot themselves in the foot again.

As soon as Pedro Porro gets the first touch on the cross Dejan Kulusevski is already off running and thinking about a counter attack.

You can't think that. The edge of the box is where the danger is. Do your job first and then think about going forward.

That just sums Tottenham up under this manager.

I cant stand Jamie Carragher but he is spot on with that
Click to expand...
Porro should have got a clear header tbf. Was cr@p.
 
Chrissivad said:
So VDV and Romero both off....

Why start them if they only had 45mins in them.
It's cm we need to change
Click to expand...

Clearly we are going to manage them (amongst certain other players) to ensure fit for semi.

Issue is, it really doesn't matter, this system is a fudging mess and won't win games in the PL.

Managers like Nuno (who actually counter naturally) are a nightmare for this system (if you can call it that).
 
Raziel said:
@SpurMeUp is correct, I was there, the crowd went toxic on Nuno, was booing his subs, usual "you don't know what you are doing"



Let me fix that -> it was reported that we went for 20 other managers

Again, I even remember this board, no one saw the logic at the time of hiring a non-toxic manager who had manager to get Wolves to European positions, to get Spurs 1 or 2 spots higher ..
Click to expand...

I was just pleased to have a manager in place after everyone else rejected us.
 
Robspur12 said:
I was happy about his appointment, at the time thought he had done well at Wolves. Again it's up to the Board to support their man, if they really believed in him. They didn't really want him so got rid. His position would not be untenable a dozen games into the season.
Click to expand...

It was the players that needed sacking. They refused to play for Nuno and you could tell the ring leader was the England captain. The players didn't give the man a chance and the fans stupidly fell for it and blamed the manager, not the players. That dressing room was toxic.
 
elltrev said:
Well we deserve to be drawing or winning based on chances created IMO, which to me is a good performance against a top 5 team.
Click to expand...
Your standards are low. We've had one decent chance (The Richy one). Tel's was a snapshot on his weak foot at a crap angle. Beyond that we haven't actually opened them up. The wide guys are playing well individually but this is how Nottingham Forest play. They aren't a possessional dominant team and have no interest in being so, so having lots of the ball against them means Diddy squat if you're not actually playing incisively and we are not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back