Lily White
Clive Wilson
Re: Northumberland Development Project
http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/foo...signers-in-rethink-over-new-home-8801178.html
http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/foo...signers-in-rethink-over-new-home-8801178.html
Chairman [of KSS] David Keirle confirmed: “The club have appointed Populous and are looking at other stadium options. We are still working with the club on other projects, but the club wants to take another look at things”.
A club spokesman confirmed: “We have approached Populous with regards to an internal fit out of the stadium.”
Interesting. While I liked the relative proximity of the seats to the pitch and the 'Wall' end, internally the ground was just too generic for my taste. I don't like the lowered corners which seem pretty pointless IMHO and I don't buy the air around the pitch argument either. The pitch at WHL is the best in the league and there is no compensation for it in the current stadium design.
Come on Daniel, lets have a stadium that looks as great on the inside as the current design looks on the outside.
Isn't this a knock on effect of a 'bowl' stadium? If all seating is at it's maximum rake, the seating on the four sides extends further back to the extent of the oval plan, than from the corners of the pitch, and therefore the highest seating at the corners end up lower? Personally I don't see a problem with the stands being parallel to the pitch with radial 'fan' shaped seating to link them at the corners - like WHL at the moment, but a bigger more refined version. This also must get the crowd closer to the pitch than a bowl, and a better atmosphere.
It's not the optimal use of space though. A bowl would fit more seats - whether or not the income difference is enough to damage the fan experience remains to be seen.
How so? Surely the front of the stands at the centre line and behind the goals have to be further away in a bowl, as the minimum oval is determined by the pinch points at the corners. Therefore the pitch area is greater and so is the overall plan, no? Also seating and gangways that are generally square are more efficient space wise than a radial pattern? Square buildings are also cheaper than curved ones.
Nice job Hudd, but honestly, I would be shocked if Levy doesn't "get it" about the stadium. He knows that the things the fans want also make good economic sense.
A storming atmosphere, fans close to the pitch, a sexy, individual "Spurs" design etc...all those things provide considerable long term intangible benefits to the club. They aren't just about romance and the unreasonable demands of moaning fans. UA or HP or Pfeizer or whoever is more likely to want their badge stuck on an iconic stadium known throughout football as being unique rather than a bowl that repeats the mistakes of the Emirates.
I don't believe Levy would compromise that overall design ethos and the kudos it would bring just to squeeze in 5,000 more seats.
5K seats is over £6m per year in ticket sales.
If I was going to have a say on the design I would think about keeping the KSS style with the wall of supporters but the change I would make is to make that wall more imposing so that it rises higher than the other three sides.