From the Cardiff post match discussion thread:
http://www.glory-glory.co.uk/showth...cussion-thread?p=521082&viewfull=1#post521082
I'm trying not to bring AVB into this directly but I have to respond to the last paragraph about TS inheriting situations from AVB as a lot was biased BS imo:
A) AVB did have to manage with a humongus injury list as well (see the defensive line-ups vs Sunderland and Liverpool for evidence); it's not as if our injury woes only started after TS became manger
B) A team which couldn't score for love or money?? After the City 6-0 did we really struggle to score up until the Liverpool game?? I'll be happy for you to show me how we struggled to score between those games
C) Conceding hatfuls? If we played City and Liverpool under TS who says we wont do the same? After all, the City rematch went similarly to Liverpool game in that we had to deal with playing vs 10 men and then let in a hatful. Who says we wont get pummeled at Anfield? Or even at the Bridge on Saturday?
D) Disillusioned and dispirited players: all a matter of opinion; many argue that right now apart from 2 or 3, there are a similar number of players disillusioned and dispirited now under TS as they were under AVB. People keep mentioning the Belgians, Capoue, Holtby, Lennon, does Soldado look much happier now etc etc
As I say I really don't want to get into the AVB stuff again but I had to counter some of that..
So I will simply ask you the following:
1) what part of the poor displays under TS do you blame the players for?
2) What part of the displays that you consider good under TS do you credit to the players?
3) what part of the poor displays under TS do you hold TS responsible for?
4) and what part of the good displays under TS are down to TS in your opinion?