This kid is the real thing.
I want Eze E. He looks a bloody star in the making.
You are all desperate for some ITK on this guy - admit it, you are...
So here it is - from jamesnutt on a QPR-forum :
The geezer has Tim Sherwood in his avatar, so it could be gonad*s though.
http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/general/qpr-fans/2529710-eze
Quality player, haven't seen him play on a while but quality nonetheless.According to Foot Mercato, Spurs have started discussions with Layvin Kurzawa's representatives about a potential move to North London.
It is understood that Premier League rivals West Ham and Manchester United have also begun talks.
The report explains that French heavyweights PSG no longer view him in their plans, while AC Milan and Inter Milan are also circling for him.
Kurzawa is out of contract with PSG at the end of the season and could be snapped up on a free transfer next summer.
The Frenchman is an a left-back blessed with rapid pace and he’s been with the Ligue 1 giants since 2015.
French heavyweights PSG no longer view him in their plans.
Sounds familiar [Aurier]. What is wrong with Kurzawa? Is he a bad egg, a nightclubber, a homophobe, disinterested, unreliable, rash... why are they getting rid yet he would be good enough for Prem footy? Suspicious
I hear you but it bugs me. We want to compete with the top teams so I am wary when any top team wants rid of a player e.g. they will have 3 or 4 left back options of varying age and ability, and they select one to get rid of... that is not the one we should go for. We should go for the one they want to keep!Honestly no idea, I dont follow French football.
Though Im inclined to think similarly of Aurier, and of situations when we are linked to players from the like of Madrid - they operate on completely different rules and so a player not being seen as good enough/welcome there really doesnt indicate anything about said player. The clubs are toys, trading players like panini stickers, often without much in the way of an obvious strategy/logic
Radars
They have Bernat who plays for spainI hear you but it bugs me. We want to compete with the top teams so I am wary when any top team wants rid of a player e.g. they will have 3 or 4 left back options of varying age and ability, and they select one to get rid of... that is not the one we should go for. We should go for the one they want to keep!
I know... Moura and VdV... I know. There are exceptions. Maybe PSG have the starting national left backs for France and Portugal, I have no clue.
So... if the centre of these radars is "worst in the league" does this radar mean Eze is really bad at Interceptions and awful at Turnovers, like almost the worst in the league?
And does this mean he is poor at shooting, turnovers and xG assisted and touches in box, compared to AM's and wingers?
The bounds of the graph are top and bottom 5% in the top 5 leagues if you're using Statsbomb's data.@scaramanga is your man on these things usually.
I think you (we) need to understand the individual stats to know the meaning.
What is a turnover? Losing the ball (and so a low number is good) or winning the ball (so a low number is bad)?
The outer edge of the radar is always good. So if someone had a complete hendecagon (11-gon) they would be perfect... but where the chart dives towards the centre, it means they are towards the bottom 5% of the entire league. In the Championship.@scaramanga is your man on these things usually.
I think you (we) need to understand the individual stats to know the meaning.
What is a turnover? Losing the ball (and so a low number is good) or winning the ball (so a low number is bad)?
The outer edge of the radar is always good. So if someone had a complete hendecagon (11-gon) they would be perfect... but where the chart dives towards the centre, it means they are towards the bottom 5% of the entire league. In the Championship.
To be pedantic... Chadli is the only one of the “Magnificent Seven” who turned in a profit and we’re currently £20m down on the not so “famous five” we have offloaded....
I saw the other day people bemoaning the "magnificent 7" bought off the back of Bale. But to my eye they either served us well, or we profited on them and reinvested that in other players (who did better!).
Chadli for example, bought for £7m, had a season where he contributed, sold for £13m - basically paying for Wanyama
To be pedantic... Chadli is the only one of the “Magnificent Seven” who turned in a profit and we’re currently £20m down on the not so “famous five” we have offloaded.
I like Lamela but for a club record transfer he’s not proved to be a great investment, albeit it’s due to unforeseen injury issues rather than lack of ability, and even Levy would struggle to get back much of that £30m fee.
Eriksen has undoubtedly proved to be great value over the years for a modest £11m outlay but I’m not sure even that’s enough to compensate for how mediocre the other £96m has done.
View attachment 7903
You are all desperate for some ITK on this guy - admit it, you are...
So here it is - from jamesnutt on a QPR-forum :
The geezer has Tim Sherwood in his avatar, so it could be gonad*s though.
http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/general/qpr-fans/2529710-eze