Yes its a fabrication. In fact its Berahino to Liverpool for 26 million.[tweet]549900703955976192[/tweet]
£7 million for Danny Ings? Seems to have good pace and work rate and with his contract winding down we might get lucky. Might have to add another couple of millions, but he would have sell-on value. Gives us options up front, even if he's just a stop gap.
Apparently Broomfield went to watch him on Boxing day.
Again, extremely unlikely. The prospect of his goals keeping Burnley up is probably going to be enough for Dyche to reject all bids for him in January. Plus, Ings gets to negotiate a better contract as a free agent in the summer: larger signing on fee, bigger agent fees and the like. He'll certainly have no shortage of suitors by then if he keeps up this sort of form, given his attributes (young, hard-working, English, technically gifted to a degree, pacy, half-decent in the air, English, doesn't seem a disruptive sort, doesn't have the profile that would merit a constant first-team spot, English).
Yeah, I don't think we'll end up getting Ings now. Maybe in the summer as a replacement for Soldado, should we find a buyer (although I don't like the prospect of two potential England players competing for one spot, since they're national team as well as club positional rivals).
Talk in the papers that AC Milan are willing to let El Sharaway leaves for 11.5 mill. Hopefully we are in for him
£7 million for Danny Ings? Seems to have good pace and work rate and with his contract winding down we might get lucky. Might have to add another couple of millions, but he would have sell-on value. Gives us options up front, even if he's just a stop gap.
Apparently Broomfield went to watch him on Boxing day.
Berahino might not fit into Pulis's plans and he loves spending all the money he can get.
Talksport reporting that WBA have told us and Liverpool that £14m is what will get Berahino.
Unlike Ings for Burnley I think selling Berahino would make some sense for WBA despite them also being in a relegation scrap.
Berahino does have 7 goals in 15 starts and 4 sub appearances, but they all seemed to come early on in the season (hasn't scored in however many games now) and their play isn't built around him.
Ings only has 4 in 16 starts, but also has 3 assists meaning he has the same goals+assists total as Berahino and seems a lot more important to Burnley's overall play.
Even £10m Burnley are unlikely to find a replacement for Ings that can slot right into a team where he is vital. For WBA though Berahino is more in the team because of his goals, not someone they built their team around. Think they're much more likely to find a suitable replacement, possibly even someone that can be a short term upgrade on Berahino for the kind of money being talked about.
Perhaps Broomfield was watching Ashley Barnes? He scored a cracker against us, scored against City on Boxing Day, and dominated City's centre backs in the air, causing confusion and setting up play.
I don't particularly want Barnes or Ings, but just saying Barnes was the standout player on Boxing Day.
(I don't think Barnes can do anything Chadli couldn't, by the way)
Barnes is to old to fit the profile of a player we would go for, not saying we don't go for older players but when we do they are usually of a higher skill level. I like the guy he is a hard worker a sort of Holt type player but not good enough for us.
Where as Ings fits the profile of a poch type player down to the ground.
Barnes is 25, Ings is 22, you are 51