Claude Makelele is the key man in all this. Whilst at Real Madrid he was declared ÔÇÿthe most important player at the clubÔÇÖ by various teammates who depended on his steady, reliable presence in the centre of the pitch. Unfortunately, one man who didnÔÇÖt value his contribution was club President Florentino Perez. Makelele was paid far less than the ÔÇÿGalacticosÔÇÖ, Perez refused to give him a more lucrative contract, and Makelele opted to leave for Chelsea.
Perez was scathing after the FrenchmanÔÇÖs departure, saying, ÔÇ£We will not miss Makelele. His technique is average, he lacks the speed and skill to take the ball past opponents, and ninety percent of his distribution either goes backwards or sideways. He wasnÔÇÖt a header of the ball and he rarely passed the ball more than three metres.ÔÇØ Which, of course, entirely missed the point, and he was widely criticized for his ignorance.
After making an immediate impact at Chelsea, pundits were queueing up to express their admiration for Makelele. By the very nature of being classed as ÔÇÿunderratedÔÇÖ by everyone, Makelele ceased to become underrated. There was no-one left who didnÔÇÖt rate him.
In fact, it probably went the other way ÔÇô his position was given the name ÔÇÿThe Makelele roleÔÇÖ, as if he had either invented the role, or brought a particularly new slant to it. Articles like this one - ÔÇ£To this day, I still believe that Real Madrid won the 2002 Champions League because of one man, and one man onlyÔǪFrenchman Claude MakeleleÔÇØ ÔÇô eventually managed to actually overrate Makelele, for that ÔÇÿone-man teamÔÇÖ statement is not true of any side in history, not even MaradonaÔÇÖs Argentina in 1986. ItÔÇÖs no less ludicrous than PerezÔÇÖs view.
The strange thing is, no-one ever clarified what ÔÇÿthe Makelele roleÔÇÖ actually meant. It certainly referred to a defensive midfielder, but did he have to be alone in that position? Was Makelele playing ÔÇÿthe Makelele roleÔÇÖ when fielded alongside Patrick Vieira for France?
Regardless, his impact sparked a sudden obsession with deep-lying central midfielders. Furthermore, after his debut season at Chelsea, the astonishing victories of first Porto and then Greece at European level promoted the virtues of defensive-minded football. Premier League teams looking to play 4-5-1 formations simply took out a striker and used another central midfielder instead.
Even Real Madrid realised their error in trying to play without a defensive midfielder, and bizarrely signed Thomas Gravesen from Everton. This rather ignored the fact that he wasnt a holding player (he merely had the appearance and disciplinary record of one). As Oliver Kay said at the time, While Gravesen might have produced more tackles than any of his Everton team-mates this season, a holding player he is not. At Everton, in fact, he requires a ball-winner, Lee Carsley, to do his legwork and to cover him on his charges upfieldhis aggression is not of the type that will break down opposition attacks like that of Claude Makelele, whom Real sold to Chelsea without a second thought in 2003.