I'm not adverse to Mason full time if he has a strong end to the campaign, clearly has our DNA - respect is earnt on performance not on age. Admittedly he got a few things wrong vs City (Sissoko!) but I would take a view at the end of the season with an open mind. Nagelsmann had to start out somewhere.
The question is,
would Mason want the job? It could (as with anyone) go South quickly - he would then have to be removed from the club and potentially be typecast as a manager at 30...
Mentally he's strong, has a good philosophy on the game, feet on the ground is aware of PL player culture but maybe lacks the savvy 'Gaffer tricks' which is where I think Powell and Ledley help out - although top level management experience also evades these guys to a degree.
Let's be entirely honest, anyone is a punt - we need a rebuild, and frankly I would rather have the team built around the understanding of the club philosophy than a 'Manager-ini' name come in and try to build a team of 30yr+ journeymen with a reputation.
If you look glass half full - how good would it be to have Mason at the helm playing good football and steering us to top 4 and some (any!!) silverware? would it be extra special? Hell yeah!
We're hanging onto Kane by a thread, having his mate in charge isn't the worst idea - and anyway, the worst case is we're back here in 12 months time picking out the next 'Manager-ini' the biggest loser in this scenario would be Mason himself.
- a ramble by RXL